User talk:Tanzania

If you want a quick answer, you should post your comment at my Swedish user talk instead. Tanzania (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Ebbe power station
Tack för att du fixade stubmallen, jag kopierade bara mallarna från en annan artikel och glömde att ändra län. --Skizziktalk 22:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Aha, det är lugnt! :) Kul med en artikel här på enwp med, om det nu intresserar någon själ! Det är trots allt en väldigt intressant byggnad. Tanzania (talk) 22:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Love (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

July 2020
Hello Tanzania. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tanzania. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 16:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . What makes you think that? I tried to use the sources I found to create an article about what I think is a relevant company. I have no connection to them at all. Tanzania (talk) 16:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The advertisement that was posted on a freelancing website a few days back and disappeared just before you posted this page. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 16:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * My only reason for writing this article: (1) a lot of news articles about it today (2) realizing that there is no information about it on English Wikipedia, though I think it is relevant. I have no clue about what freelance website you are talking about. Tanzania (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Would be happy to hear what in the nature of my edits that gives the impression of financial stake. Tanzania (talk) 16:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

"Ministry on the Status and Rights of Women in Haiti" and "Solidarite Fanm Ayisyèn"
Thank you for creating the English versions of these two Wikipedia entries. One of the hurdles I find is the problem of citations, as Dr. Lise-Marie Déjean does not identify as a founding member although she has served as an important member and leader since joining the organization soon after its 1987 founding. Since this is a distinction that is important to her but has been lost in some Haitian newspaper coverage like that done by Le Nouvelliste, I am looking through various publications that cover women's social movement organizing in Haiti, particularly from 1987 on. I find your initiative very encouraging as I comb through available material. Thanks again!Kokobe1 (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Kokobe1

Jocelyn Dow moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jocelyn Dow, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  00:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nadine Al Haraki for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadine Al Haraki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nadine Al Haraki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 17:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Natasha Wang Mwansa


The article Natasha Wang Mwansa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This artcle dosent reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage. Yes she she has done some works here and there but the fact only one source brings up the topic but that is not covered or picked up by anyone the other site is womendeliver.org/ which is just a membership. I for one dont thing that makes this artcle pass."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK YellowWisdom (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jocelyn Dow
Hello, Tanzania. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jocelyn Dow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

OVERLINKING
Hi, thanks for your work. Please note that ordinary words, dates, years, centuries, etc, are not linked on en.WP. Tony (talk)  23:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, – I was not aware of this. Tanzania (talk) 21:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Turin factory occupation of 1920 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turin factory occupation of 1920 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Turin factory occupation of 1920 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Grnrchst (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)