User talk:Taqabul012

TechGenies LLC moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, TechGenies LLC, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 13:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: TechGenies LLC (February 5)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TechGenies_LLC Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Davidwr was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'll save everyone some time. After realizing all of the references were to the company's web site or its subsidiaries and seeing that the company is fairly new, I did some due diligence searches and came up with less than 70 hits TOTAL when I searched for. I skimmed the list and there wasn't anything that would be close to one or more reliable sources combining to show significant coverage where both the sources and the coverage were independent of this company.

Sorry, maybe in a few years this company will have enough independently-written press in reliable sources qualify for an article, or maybe it's got a stealth project that will make a big splash in the press tomorrow, but until then, it's simply not notable and therefore does not qualify for an article, no matter how well-written and well-referenced the article is.

davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  19:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)