User talk:Tara Chopra

Bold, revert, discuss cycle
Hi there, re: this resubmission, when content you've submitted has been reverted with an explanation, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for inclusion. The specific issue I raised, is that we don't typically include acts our biographical subjects have worked with in the lead, as it tends to inflate the importance of our article subjects, as if we're trying to bolster notability by association.

Out of curiosity, are you being paid to edit this article? If so, per WP:PAID, you are required to divulge that you are being paid, as well as who is paying you, who your client is, and any other relevant details. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

DO NOT COPY
DO NOT COPY is a basic concept in academia. The content you added at Christian Scott in these editswas copied from other sources, largely from here and here and probably other sources. This is unacceptable. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Christian Scott. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)