User talk:Tarheel95/April 2012

CVU Academy
Hello there! Your input is request at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. You had commented on the re-formatting discussion at WP:CVU but have yet to comment on the progress done to implement a major change discussed during the reformatting discussion, namely the training for new anti-vandals. Any input would be appreciated, thank you. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

CVU Task Force
A discussion that you might be able to add an expert opinion on is happening at WT:CVU. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Page Edits
Hi Tarheel,

Quick question. I've made several edits to Wikipedia articles over the last few years, almost all of them are small edits to grammatical, spelling, dates, glaring errors, etc (things of that nature). Just now I made an edit to Attleboro High School page, however this was a humorous (IE counterproductive) edit, basically to test who's monitoring the edits I make.

My question is, being this was the first time I noticed that I received a message pertaining to an edit I made, were all of my previous edits accepted (not reverted) by monitors such as yourself?

Thanks, my apologies if this was not the correct forum for questions like this. Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.60.29 (talk) 02:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just started using a new software for "Vandalism detection" and had meant to label your edit as one made in good faith. Just disregard my message, I apologize for the Snafu. Thanks, Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 02:47, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * To answer your question, anyone can make instant changes to almost any page on the wiki, it just so happened the edit you made fit the criteria for the queue I was watching for malicious edits. Your edit, while "counterproductive" was not 'vandalism' and thus, I assumed good faith and reverted the edit. With the human error mentioned above, you got a message similar to the one delivered to 'vandals' as a mistake. Again, disregard that message as your edit was in good faith. I hope this answers your question. Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 03:21, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

stub tags
Please take care not to add a stub to an article like Béatrice Vialle which already has a specific stub tag (it just wastes other editors' time). Please also remember that all stub tags should go after everything else except inter-language links (WP:ORDER): if you head for the right place to put it you're more likely to spot the existing one which makes the new one unnecessary. Thanks. Pam D  08:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)