User talk:Tarkitecture

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan (talk) 10:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GregJackP   Boomer!   13:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Response to your E-mail
Tarkitecture,

The article has 7 references, 6 of which appear to be reliable sources that are independent of Scott (the 7th is by Scott, and considered a self-published source, which is normally not suitable for determining notability).

Of the 6 left, I could verify 4 of them. Of the 3, 2 did not mention Scott at all, and do not establish either the fact cited, nor notability for Scott. The 3rd mentioned Scott only in passing, which is also not sufficient for notability. The 4th, the Honorary Fellow cite merely mentions his name without any description of the criteria for the honor. Again, this is not sufficient for notability.

I do not have access to either the Abbott or Pearman references. Based on what you state in your e-mail they may very well be reliable enough to establish notability, but based on the ones that I can verify, I cannot make that assumption. I would be willing to look at them, if you could scan in the relevant pages (along with the title page) and e-mail them to me.

It would also be good if you could find some times that he has been mentioned in newspapers, journals, etc. Most of these I can access through JSTOR, Ebscohost, or Hein-Online. Another point I noted is that it shows he is a Commander, Order of the British Empire. Any source that shows this award (other than just listing CBE behind his name) would help, especially any mentions of when and why it was awarded.

Finally, as you are related to the subject, once the article is moved to mainspace, you need to declare your relationship on the talkpage, and be careful on your edits. That is covered under conflict of interest policies. It won't stop you from creating the article, nor from editing it, but it does need to be disclosed.

I'm sure we can get it to mainspace, we just need to verify the refs.

Regards, GregJackP   Boomer!   00:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: N Keith Scott
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tarkitecture (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I have added web citations from Debrett's showing confirmation of the award of a CBE in 1989 and other information in my article. I confirm that N Keith Scott is my father Tarkitecture (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC) T Tarquin Scott.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/N Keith Scott concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/N Keith Scott, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: N Keith Scott (November 15)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Green Cardamom (talk) 07:36, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/N Keith Scott concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/N Keith Scott, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/N Keith Scott


Hello Tarkitecture. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "N Keith Scott".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)