User talk:TarlanT

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-American sentiment in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carte blanche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anti-Americanism in Russia concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anti-Americanism in Russia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of Russian military operations concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of Russian military operations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anti-Americanism in Russia


Hello TarlanT. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Anti-Americanism in Russia".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  DGG ( talk ) 02:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of Russian military operations


Hello TarlanT. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Timeline of Russian military operations".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Soviet poster American freedom.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soviet poster American freedom.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Tsumikiria. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gab (social network) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 15:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Gab (social network). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 17:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

@Tsumikiria My edits are not biased. They made article more neutral. Any good encyclopedic article should start with subjects mission statement. That's what I did. Put the Gab's mission statement first. And everything else followed.


 * No, absolutely not. We don't do mission statements anymore, see Avoid mission statements and WP:NOTPROMOTION. We go by what reliable sources say about a subject, not the subject itself. Otherwise we might as well write Democratic People's Republic of Korea as a "heaven for democracy" or Nazi Germany as "on a mission to free Europe from global Jewry". Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 19:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Can I know why I was imposed those sanctions? I made 2 different edits, in good faith. After the first one was reverted. I tried another edit with even more neutrality, by removing the sources on subject assessment. I tried to make article more neutral/encyclopedic and start with subject's mission statement. But after clarifications from Tsumikirika regarding the changes in Mission statements policies, I got her point and stopped from another edit. Why am I getting punished ? Or am I misreading it? The message itself and the sanctions page seems a big vague on what those rulings were imposed on. Me, article or something else. Thank you. TarlanT 12:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No, you were not sanctioned. This is only a standard message to notice editors that there is this rule, and you need to follow it and edit carefully. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 20:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)