User talk:Tartarrman

September 2013
Your recent editing history at Manda clan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've used the article's talk page and requested for help at a relevant noticeboard.--Tartarrman (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Since this is a content dispute, the reliable sources noticeboard would be a better choice than the administrators' noticeboard for incidents. —C.Fred (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Please, check the Talk:The_History_of_India,_as_Told_by_Its_Own_Historians where i posted reasons for my revert. I didn't know such reverts count as vandalism because i coudn't find any references in what you changed for the lead section.--Tartarrman (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonnovabluesolid.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bonnovabluesolid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)