User talk:Tartarus/Archive8

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)  §hepBot  ( Disable )  20:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 05:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot  ( Disable ) 

Re: 410 Squadron copy editing
Hi! Thanks for the barnstar. I found what you added to be interesting, so I thought I'd polish it a bit. I may add some more stuff myself (about the aerobatic team). Keep up the good work. Cheers. B C talk to me  04:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Tartarus, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 22:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Please read WP:NFCC and don't abuse huggle.
Huggle is for trusted users only to revert vandalism. I am not a vandal. If you revert another edit of mine again without a proper edit summary you risk having your use revoked. 78.150.75.10 (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Curiosity.
Its called a dynamic ip. Also try RC patrolling manually for a few days in order to restore good faith instead of pulling the trigger too quickly. I am a former Wikipedian who has suffered from vandalism. 78.150.75.10 (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Leonard G. Shepard
Thank you for your assist on the above article. You have added several facts that my source did not show. As a retired Coast Guardsman, I have a real interest that all things 'Coast Guard' get represented on WP fairly and accurately, and your assistance has helped.

There is one bothersome detail about Shepard; different sources list different birth dates and death dates! I wonder what is really right? I will continue with some more research and try to find the answers. If you find anything more concrete, please let me know on my talk page. Again, thanks for your interest. Cuprum17 (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I will look for an official date of birth if it helps, and thank you for your recognition, but it is you that deserve credit for the major work done. T ARTARUS  talk 02:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Trivial edits with AWB
I noticed 17 edits of Austro-Hungarian submarines articles in which you, using AWB, removed a single return character. May I remind you that the AWB Rules of Use suggest that you: "Avoid making insignificant or inconsequential edits such as only adding or removing some white space … because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists."

(emphasis as in original). In all 17 cases, the extra return character was in place to prevent the clashing of the navbox template with the bottom of the references. Please respect the AWB rules and the time of other editors and avoid making edits like these in the future. — Bellhalla (talk) 04:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)