User talk:Tarun sridhar

Unsourced and improperly sourced content.
Hi there, I've reverted these edits at Srimanthudu as well as some of your other edits like here and here. A few issues: Please take a few minutes to familiarise yourself with our guidelines on reliable sources. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) All references must appear in the article, not in an edit summary. No reader would be expected to look in the edit history to find references.
 * 2) In the case of the changes at Srimanthudu (and elsewhere), you've modified the data but left the old sources, which is indistinguishable from vandalism, as anyone checking the old source would not find the new data.
 * 3) Apart from your assertion, there's no indication Indianmoviestats.com is considered a reliable source by anyone other than you. Per WP:UGC we don't use blogs as references, nor do we use other faceless sites. Only sites with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy should be used, and unless you're in a position to cogently argue who is behind the site and that the site has an established reputation for accuracy, the site should not be used. You should probably take this up at the Indian cinema task force at Wikipedia. See also WP:ICTF, which does not acknowledge Indianmoviestats.com.
 * 4) Indian cinema is a highly problematic area that is prone to a lot of inaccurate data largely because there are so many garbage blogs and websites that practice poor journalism, and sites that are manipulated by production houses and promoters. All data should be treated with great circumspection and not swallowed as 100% accurate. So this edit is problematic, because you've removed a range of opinion from generally reliable sources and replaced it with a definitive number derived from a source that has not been established by the Wikipedia community as reliable.