User talk:Tasman2022

Hi Tasman2022! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Catherine Cusack (politician) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Catherine Cusack (politician), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. --Find bruce (talk) 23:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Bruce. I am stumped to understand how we resolve this. I deleted the gay committee stuff because I have a press council adjudication that repudiates the source. Happy to provide. I also added in some of Cusack's other work but that was deleted too - why? Any assistance in resolving this would be greatly appreciated as I am trying to work Wiki as a new user. Thanks Tasman2022 (talk) 00:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi the appropriate place to discuss the content of an article is generally the talk page for that article - Talk:Catherine Cusack (politician) & I have started the discussion there - you will note that the major issue is that the Press Council adjudication linked there does not repudiate the source. Please feel free to respond on that talk page, that way any interested editor can contribute to the discussion. I had overlooked your other contribution and as they were sourced I have restored them to the article as well as tidied up the references. Find bruce (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)