User talk:Tasmin Hansmann

Welcome
 <div style="background-color: Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.  Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)   Hello, Tasmin Hansmann, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting started
 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Finding your way around
 * Table of contents
 * Directories and indexes
 * Department directory
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Editing articles
 * How to develop an article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting help
 * Frequently asked questions
 * Cheatsheet
 * Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
 * The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
 * Help pages
 * Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How you can help
 * Community Portal
 * Join a WikiProject
 * Follow Wikipedia etiquette
 * Practice civility
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rewriting Extinction (November 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rewriting Extinction and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rewriting Extinction, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rewriting_Extinction Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rewriting_Extinction reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rewriting Extinction has been accepted
 Rewriting Extinction, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Rewriting_Extinction help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Star  Mississippi  21:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Paul Goodenough moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Paul Goodenough, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Girth Summit  (blether) 12:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi - a bit more on this. The article you wrote is, to my eye, unacceptable promotional. We aim for a neutral, objective tone in our articles. I also note that you say you worked on the article in collaboration with the subject of the article - I wonder whether you have read WP:COI? If you are writing about someone you know, you should be sure to put any drafts through the AfC process, and you should declare your connection with them (there are instructions for how to do that at the COI guideline I linked to). You also need to improve the sourcing - for the subject to be considered notable, it will need to have multiple sources which give the subject significant depth of coverage, and which are reliable, independent of the subject, and secondary. From a skim through the ones in your article, the only articles I saw that ticked all those boxes just gave the subject a passing mention. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  12:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello Girth,
 * thanks for the feedback. The promotional phrasing will be removed, no problem.
 * I should have phrased the "collaboration" part better. I do not know Paul Goodenough personally, I only know him briefly professionally and he asked me to write the Wiki entry for him as I did the one for Rewriting Extinction. He just told me the private information about his early life, the rest was based on my research. A lot of the linked sources are interviews with him or articles about Rewriting Extinction, which he founded, for example in BBC, etc, as well as the IMDB sites about him and his media work. However, I will try to find more sources. Could you tell me an example of a source that was not notable, just so I get an idea of what doesn't work? Tasmin Hansmann (talk) 13:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And to clarify and to avoid misunderstandings: I wrote the Wiki page for Rewriting Extinction on my own and him asking me to write his was just a question he asked me, not a job. If I delete the information on his early life (the only influence he had on this), would it be okay and if not, what happens to the article? Tasmin Hansmann (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi - can I ask you to clarify your relationship with him? I'm a bit confused, you say you don't know him personally but you know him professionally, and he's asking you to write articles on his behalf - what's the story?
 * With regards to the draft, it needs better sourcing. I don't see any independent sources that give him, as a subject distinct from the project, significant depth of coverage. If he's only known for his association with that project, then we should just mention him in the article about the project rather than attempt to write a separate page for him. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you asked above for some guidance on appropriate sources. You should really read through the links I gave you above, but breifly:
 * IMDB and h2g2.com are very bad sources, from our perspective. They are user-generated (see WP:UGC), and as such are considered unreliable. You should remove them, and any content supported by them.
 * BBC newscast is potentially useful, but that's a 37 minute episode, and you haven't indicated the time at which the subject is discussed, so it's very hard to use it to verify any claim.
 * The WiltshireLive piece looks like a lot like a rehashed press-release in the local press to me - I wouldn't put much store in that.
 * The Guardian piece is good - that's a reliable news source, they've interviewed multiple people to get their take on it, and they give the charity substantial depth of coverage - I don't have any problem accepting that the charity is notable, based on sources like that. However, it only gives a passing mention to Goodenough himself - there's no depth of coverage there.
 * The Greenhouse piece is an interview - these are discussed at WP:INTERVIEW. They can be useful for getting basic information about a subject, but since anything they say about themselves is neither independent nor secondary, they don't really help establish notability.
 * Hope that helps. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Goodenough (April 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Goodenough and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_Goodenough Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sionk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_Goodenough reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Paul Goodenough
Hello, Tasmin Hansmann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul Goodenough, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)