User talk:Tassarov

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I personally invite you to do so in my own sandbox (just follow the simple rules!). Again, welcome! &mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 19:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Day of the Tiles
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 21:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You have recently re-created the article Day of the Tiles, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Danny Lilithborne 22:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

This article requires sources and references in order to justify its notable status. If they cannot be provided then the article will be deleted in due course. If you can provide them quickly, add a tag to the article. If not, copy the contents to a user sub-page and work on the article in private. (aeropagitica) 22:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't quite understand why the article has been branded nonsense. Possibly it is because they did not read it and look at related articles and understand the signficance of the event. The article needs work, sure, but I oppose deletion unless it can be shown that the article has been left as a stub for an excessive period of time. For now, keep it. Phaedrus86 00:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)