User talk:Tasties.food.2017

Welcome!
Hello, Tasties.food.2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page We're the Millers did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome.  Ravensfire  (talk) 03:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, We're the Millers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Yes, this needs a reliable source that explicitly makes the claim.  Ravensfire  (talk) 18:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 01:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at We're the Millers. ''This claim has been removed repeatedly by several different editors. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before continuing. '' Sum mer PhD v2.0 05:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Youtube is not a WP:Reliable source per WP:YOUTUBE and forums are not reliable sources either. I also remind you of WP:3RR. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 04:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

We're the Millers
Please discuss the issue at Talk:We're the Millers before continuing.

Your edit has been reverted repeatedly by two editors and you are currently in violation of WP:EW.

Before restoring your edit, you must establish a consensus to do so on the article's talk page. If you restore the claim before doing so again, you will be blocked from editing. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 05:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Kolamavu Kokila that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your edit summaries and talk page posts of late are clear personal attacks directed towards other edits. Please stop. It's not conducive towards a collaborative editing process when you personalize disputes and you've done. You need to stop. Follow the steps in WP:DR, not stooping to belittling others.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kolamavu Kokila shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Take it to the talk page or leave it out. Meters (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Email and talk page
Please do not email me again, ever. You continued with your insulting, dismissive style and showed absolutely none of the collaborative nature that Wikipedia depends on, just as you've shown in your talk page communication. Consider this, people have tried to work with you but as you because more hostile, that cooperation and assistance has disappeared. Consider this a request to not email me for anything and to not post anything on my talk page unless required by policy. I will respond to polite discussions on article talk page. In return, I will not post further on your talk page unless required.  Ravensfire  (talk) 15:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Apparently, I wasn't clear enough. DO NOT EMAIL ME.  Your emails are not being treated appropriated and deleted as spam. , would you consider blocking this editor's access to email during the block should this continue?  Ravensfire  (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

As i mentioned, YOU are in my page, YOU interfered with my edits, and YOU undid my edits. PLEASE STAY AWAY .... I have no interest in contacting any of you. Tasties.food.2017 (talk) 22:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

To all lords: Ravensfire, Vaselineeeeeeee, SummerPhDv2, Meters, Madrenergic, lord Roem and any one else whom i may have missed out ... DONT MESSAGE ME OR MAIL ME OR SPAM MY PAGE.