User talk:Tastypotato0932

An extended welcome
Hi Tastypotato0932. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 03:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Joaquin Phoenix. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JG66 (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on A Day in the Life. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JG66 (talk) 06:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song), you may be blocked from editing. Fan sites such as Beatles Bible and Beatlesbooks.com are not considered reliable sources. In each case, their content is written and edited by a single user, meaning they fail Wikipedia's requirement that sources have significant editorial oversight rather than contain the work and reflect the opinion of one writer. JG66 (talk) 04:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at She Came In Through the Bathroom Window. Sundayclose (talk) 00:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Is there something about the above warning that you don't understand? Because here, here, here, here, and here you made unsourced edits. It doesn't matter if the information is right or wrong. What matters is that you must provide a source. Do you think you are immune to a block? Let me assure you that there is nothing special about you as a Wikipedia editor that will prevent you from getting a block. This will be the last time I communicate with you about this. You have been more than adequately warned many times on this talk page. Beatles articles in particular have a lot of eyes on them. And we are watching your edits like a hawk. Straighten up, or get blocked. Sundayclose (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at All My Loving. Please desist from your constant disruptive editing and self-styled "correcting" of Personnel lists in Beatles song articles. JG66 (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at When I'm Sixty-Four. Sundayclose (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Yellow Submarine (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 02:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Cry Baby Cry. Sundayclose (talk) 14:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Yellow Submarine (song); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Penny Lane. Sundayclose (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Chompy Ace. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bella Thorne, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chompy Ace 09:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Avengers: Endgame, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chompy Ace 09:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Avengers: Infinity War, you may be blocked from editing. Chompy Ace 09:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  09:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Edits like this are only going to be reverted. They need a source or at least an indication of how they can be verified or they are an unproductive use of your time and other editors' time. Peter James (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 14:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)