User talk:Tatchell

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Tatchell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 02:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

BLP
Please familiarise yourself with the rules regard biographys of living people. Take your additions to the talk page if you must, but extraordinary claims, especially of a negative nature require extraordinary sources. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  21:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Do the rules of living people's biographies state that we can't talk about this? All that was put in was that he has "been accused" - you cannot deny this - the evidence from reputable news sources shows this. The fact that there is a subsection about it (conveniently at the bottom of the page) proves that this does not go against the rules regarding biographies. What you've done is unreasonable. I believe you need to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's founding principle, being a place where all can freely access uncensored knowledge - these are facts (allegations - he is NOT necessarily a war criminal BUT it is a defining feature of his career and publicity at the moment and demands to be stated if it is reasonable to state that he is a "philanthropist" at the top of his page). It is outrageous to many people that the introduction is not in any way balanced.

I cannot see how you object to this unless you are unfairly defending Mr Blair for ulterior purposes sir/madam.


 * If you want to introduce controversial claims into WP:BLP entries it is on you to provide the evidence that the claims are both correct and warranted. The place to take this now is the talk page of the article. I have no interest in getting involved in a discussion with you on these pages, the above claim of ulterior motives is a clear violation of WP:AGF and bordering on WP:NPA. Take it to the talk page and leave out the personal attacks. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me,  Stuff I've done )  21:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)