User talk:Tatianahinterreither

Vandalism-only account
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ian Cairns (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Please sign your posts with. Thanks very much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tatianahinterreither (talk) 21:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Random, etymology and pronunciation.

Etymology From Middle English raundon, from Old French randon, from randir (“to gallop”) ( > French randonnée (“long walk”)), from Frankish *rant (“a running”), see run. Used in English since the 14th Century. [edit]Pronunciation enPR: răn'dəm, IPA: /ˈrændəm/, SAMPA: /"r{nd@m/ Audio (US)

More… (file) [edit]Noun random (plural randoms) (obsolete) Speed, full speed; impetuosity, force. 1485, Sir Thomas Malory, Le Morte Darthur, Book I.10: And therwith two of them dressid their sperys, and Ulfyus and Brastias dressid theire speres, and ranne to gyder with grete raundon.

April Fools Day is today! April Fools' Day or All Fools' Day is a day celebrated in various countries on April 1. The day is marked by the commission of hoaxes and other practical jokes of varying sophistication on friends, family members, enemies, and neighbors, or sending them on a fool's errand, the aim of which is to embarrass the gullible. Traditionally, in some countries, such as the UK, Canada, Australia, and South Africa the jokes only last until noon, and someone who plays a trick after noon is called an "April Fool".[1] Elsewhere, such as in France, Ireland, Italy, South Korea, Japan, Russia, The Netherlands, Brazil, and the U.S., the jokes last all day. The earliest recorded association between April 1 and foolishness can be found in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (1392). Many writers suggest that the restoration of January 1 as New Year's Day in the 16th century was responsible for the creation of the holiday, but this theory does not explain earlier references.

Tatianahinterreither (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)To wikipedia staff: I have agreed with the terms and will do my best to stay within guidlines.

Tatianahinterreither Tatianahinterreither (talk) 20:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

(talk) 17:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)





For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

[Category: Wikipedians in England]]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grepolis
A tag has been placed on Grepolis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tommy (msg) 18:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal of move portions template
I have reverted this edit in which you removed a move portions template from Eyjafjallajökull. It is hardly constructive to simply remove this template which informs of a current proposal to separate information about the glacier and the underlying mountain range, especially since you gave no reason for your action. __meco (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Iuytf"
A page you created, Iuytf, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 20:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quikly
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Quikly, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foopets
A tag has been placed on Foopets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pistis: Disambiguation Page


The article Pistis: Disambiguation Page has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The list of links do not have similar titles, no need for disambiguation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clubmarx (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit Semiprotected
Please do not use the template on your own user pages. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  15:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pistis (disambiguation)
I have nominated Pistis (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pistis (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 22:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Ouy
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Poo (town) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 10:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Vanilla planifolia. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 10:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Template:God, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 10:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

---
HAPPY WIKIBIRTHDAY!!! EarthCom1000 (talk) 10:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)