User talk:TatyanaZhelyazkova

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mario Bruno (November 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mario Bruno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mario_Bruno Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mario_Bruno reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I was blocked but i didn't do anything wrong.
I read that i should post this text here.

I am new in this website so I'm not sure if I'm doing it right but i hope it works. TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, TatyanaZhelyazkova. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Yamla (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir/ Madam,
 * thank You for keeping wikipedia safe and fair, how ever i don't think my blocking was reasonable. As you were placing my blog I was in a process of adding sources to my page, the first version was poorly sourced because it was my first time in creating such.
 * The page is about a professional flutist that has contributed and achieved a lot in a small but important niche, and me being also a flute student myself, am an admirer of his work and wanted to let it be known. There are far too less pages about flutists and some of them deserve to be written about. This is why I think the block was not fair.
 * I would be glad if You reconsider Your decision.
 * Best regards
 * Tatyana TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You are confused. This is not a blog. Nor have you addressed your violations of WP:COI. Additionally, the content you were uploading was blatantly inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

 * If you are completely unaffiliated with the subject, how is this image your "own work"?-- Ponyo bons mots 21:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It is not, I asked it to be sent to me. But since it is not made from a professional photographer and therefore freely licensed I thought I should list it as "my own work". It's my fault, I can change the description if I am allowed. TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Did you ask the subject of the photo to send it to you?-- Ponyo bons mots 21:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I asked politely and they sent it and allowed me to use it. TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 22:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, the photo situation has been finally cleared. What can i do to proceed with my request to review my block? Should i send it again? TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 15:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You should modify your unblock request to address your violation of WP:COPYRIGHT by falsely claiming someone else's image was your own work, thereby placing the entire project in jeopardy. You should address your inappropriately promotional edits (WP:PROMO). You should specify the exact nature of your relationship to the subject (note I'm not claiming you have a romantic relationship or anything like that, but you've clearly at least met). You should tell us how your future edits would differ from your prior edits. --Yamla (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the help, I will do that. TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 15:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You also need to go to Wikimedia commons and stop falsely claiming the image is your own work. It currently still makes that claim. --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I can not find the option to change the author or source. TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Request to review block

 * (deep sigh) Please describe what constructive, non promotional, non WP:conflict of interest edits you would make. Thanks.--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

You've already been told, very clearly, you won't be unblocked to write about Mario Bruno. --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

I have been told very clearly the following:

"(deep sigh) Please describe what constructive, non promotional, non WP:conflict of interest edits you would make. Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)".

And I am following these instructions.

As I understand the reason for there to even be the possibility of requesting to be unblocked is for people to learn from their mistakes and make their articles better. Not to be insulted or bullied into giving up any tries after the first mistake.

None of the comments given to me have been respectful or helpful. I would imagine that is one of the purposes of senior users. TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please do not make every comment here an unblock request, only one open request is needed at a time.
 * Our experience tells us that allowing people in your position to dive right back into editing about the same topic is a waste of time for everyone involved(including the editor) as despite what the editor may claim they usually don't understand our content and other policies. We're going to want to see you demonstrate your understanding of relevant policies by editing in other areas unrelated to your conflict of interest. After a time, you may later be permitted to indirectly edit about Mr. Bruno, but not now. Are there other topics you might edit about? 331dot (talk) 22:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear admin,
 * thank you for your answer and the explanation, this makes sense and I respect the decision.
 * I am interested in editing mostly about living musicians but also about classical music in general (composers, orchestras, festivals). But I don't need to stay in my area of expertise. I will maybe try editing also in other areas.
 * Thank you again TatyanaZhelyazkova (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)