User talk:Taurgo

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Sarsawa Air Base. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 13:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Qsys
A tag has been placed on Qsys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 18:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

India quick links
utcursch | talk 06:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

With proper sources
Mr.Taurgo, you please always ensure that whenever you make edits, you do it with proper sources. That will be very helpful. Thanking you.Bcs09 (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

September 2011

 * If you are not Chanakyathegreat, perhaps you would like to give a really convincing explanation as to why your edits appear to mirror his? Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * My major edits have been on blue-water navy and green-water navy articles. Apart from that you will not find any major edits from me targeted on any other article. On blue-water navy, I have been emphasising that Royal Navy should be put as Navy which had blue-water capabilities but have now diminished capabilities because of lack of carrier-aviation. For green-water navy, there were lots of edits in which russian navy and indian navy were deleted, so I edited the article for that. I am pretty sure that other than than these two articles you will not find any major edits from my account. Further, I have not followed "chanakyathegreat", if he has contributed or made any updates on the two articles, as I mentioned above, then he followed me there, I did not. Leaving the decision to your discretion. Thanks.


 * I'd like to hear a really, really convincing reason how you know nothing about Chanakyathegreat when you've been using the same computer as a series of other accounts, also blocked as sockpuppets of that user. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 23:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Hersfold, Anthony Bradbury and Atama. I no longer wish to get my account unblocked. I understand that you have the authority to block accounts, and you have exercised that. However, I do not have anything to do with "Chanakyathegreat".

I am sure that I am not a sock-puppet on any other user, my id "Taurgo" has been solely used by me, and one of my article on "INS Chakra", since been re-directed to "Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa", has been marked as one of the good article out of 12,963 good articles on wikipedia, as of today. I am leaving wikipedia now and I will not be creating any other user id at all. It does not make sense to be associated with a community where people-in-administration can not differentiate between right and wrong. So, I myself quit from wikipedia, I am sure that your "blocking" of my user id, will be helpless to prevent that at least.

Signing Off -

Taurgo.

I am on the subnet of a network and there are thousands of people in my office, who will be using the same proxy server. So today, I became a sock puppet of someone by the user-id "Skonduri" as well (refer the information below). So you can very well also block me for any violation that has been committed by "Skonduri".

I have just seen this on my talk page -

- You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia due to an autoblock affecting your IP address. This is because someone using this internet address or shared proxy server was blocked. The ability of all users on this IP address to edit pages has been automatically suspended to prevent abuse by the blocked party. Innocent users are sometimes caught in an autoblock. It may be the case that you have done nothing wrong.

A user of this IP address was blocked by HelloAnnyong for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Skonduri". The reason given for Skonduri's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: This block has been set to expire: 05:42, 12 October 2011.

Note that you have not been blocked from editing directly. Most likely your computer is on a shared network with other people.

Not my sock id
I noticed that many ids that i did not created has been linked to me. This is pure stupidity and shows racism and bias in Wikipedia. It shows how one can be blocked by claiming to be a sock, then if they create another account for editiing, they can be again blocked. The reason for the first blocked may be as simple as claiming that Britain is no longer a great power or Royal navy not a blue water navy. Such is the racism in Wikipedia.Groupsets (talk) 03:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

I know Groupsets, initially I was so upset about this arrogant behaviour of wikipedia moderators, then I smiled on their stupidity and since then has quit wikipedia. Since, then I have joined another defence blogs and now I am connecting with the defence community in a lot better way. Have a pleasant day. Take care. - Taurgo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.74.119 (talk) 16:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)