User talk:Taurus2000

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 14:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Jedi
Please try to avoid weasel words, as you did in Jedi, such as "It can be said..." or "Critics say...". Use direct quotes or references from reliable sources. Weasel words suggest a violation of Wikipedia's "no original research" policy. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony 14:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Do not post fanfic
Do not post your own fanfic onto Battlestar Galactica articles such as Twelve Colonies again. --Ricimer 01:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flexible modular scheduling


A tag has been placed on Flexible modular scheduling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The article has been completely unsourced for the past 2 years as well as being a remarkably insignificant system.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 155blue (talk) 03:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Flexible modular scheduling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flexible modular scheduling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flexible modular scheduling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DES (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quorum of Twelve


The article Quorum of Twelve has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Quorum of Twelve for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quorum of Twelve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quorum of Twelve (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quorum of Twelve listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quorum of Twelve. Since you had some involvement with the Quorum of Twelve redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SJK (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)