User talk:Tavatar/Archive 2

Human Rights in Hong Kong
Thank you for assessing Human Rights in Hong Kong. I will add the citations asap. Apart from that, do you have any other suggestion to improve it to GA status? Craddocktm (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Aside from the citation issue, the other problem I noticed is the lead section (WP:LEAD). Given the size of the article, I would recommend increasing it to 3-4 solid paragraphs that provide a good overview of the article.  This is one of the thing they will definitely look at in a GA review.  Other than that, double check the points listed inWP:GA? then the article should be ready for a GAR.  Tvtr (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

HKSAR passport article
Hi Tavatar, many thanks for the time which you have taken to assess this article - I have responded to the comments you have left on the article's discussion page. Kind regards, Bonus bon (talk) 12:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Eugene Pao declined speedy deletion
as the article asserts significance, a lower standard than notability. Actually, asserts notability with "international." Dloh cierekim  01:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * chiming in here, Pao is not generally well known, but in the fairly small circle which is Hong Kong, he's certainly at the top of the tree as a jazz musician. Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 08:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

BLP refimprove tag options
Hi, i noticed your edit to the Yuen Wah article which removed a "BLP unreferenced" tag. I agree that the tag was not appropriate, as in fact there was a reference in the article. However, I want to call your attention to other tag options: BLP refimprove which would call for improvements of referencing, BLP IMDB refimprove which does that and notes IMDB, a source which many regard as not very reliable, is one of the sources; BLP IMDB-only refimprove which notes IMDB is the only source in a given article. In this case the BLP IMDB refimprove tag seems most appropriate, and i just added it. I think that is good to keep up some pressure / call attention to the need for additional referencing in that article. Also relevant in articles like this might be nofootnotes and morefootnotes. Keep up the good work! Cheers, --doncram (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Goddess of Democracy (Hong Kong)
Thanks for reviewing the article. I would just like to say that I disagree that it is 'low importance', but then I'm hardly objective because I wrote the whole article. ;-) Cheers, Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 08:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * It was hard to determine where to rate the importance for this article at this point, since this is a somewhat specialized topic. Based on our assessment definition, I would think it's somewhere between Low and Mid right now.  I don't think there are enough attention locally and internationally associated with this topic yet.  Perhaps future developments and events could improve its current status, such as becoming a permanent landmark or spark further controversy.  On a side note, if you ever feel an article has been mis-assessed, or in need of reassessment, you could always request a new assessment at WP:HK/A or bring up the topic in WT:HK. :) Tvtr (tlk–cntrbtn) 16:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Wow!
Tavatar, I see that you've been doing a lot with PlayStation articles, I've seen you do a lot today! I just wanted to say that is awesome! (Oh yeah, although you probably have no idea who I am, I'm just complimenting you) Thanks. -Endofskull (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm just helping out with re-link PlayStation games since we moved the links recently. Tvtr (tlk–cntrbtn) 20:49, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Thought you were helping! Well, anyways, thanks a whole bunch! -Endofskull (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Citation barn star!
Hi there. Noticed you did some good stuff tidying up refs at Hong Kong. I've put a barn star on your "awards" page. Thanks for your work. --bodnotbod (talk) 22:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 01:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Hong Kong
I'm swamped at the moment, but if you've added Hong Kong to the PR list, it is sure to be reviewed. I will watch to see if it shows up in the backlog and comment then if I can. Finetooth (talk) 01:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks! Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 17:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look tomorrow and respond on the PR page. Finetooth (talk) 04:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hong Kong Archaeological Society
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hong Kong Archaeological Society, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hkarch.org/en_intro.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 02:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 00:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)