User talk:Tawker/Dec07

Kevin Gamble (netcaster)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kevin Gamble (netcaster), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Kevin Gamble (netcaster). — Yavoh 16:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Protection of 2010 Olympics article
Hi there, I noticed you protected the article on 2010 Winter Olympics immediately after my last edit. I'm kind of wondering what is up with that; is there some problem with my adding the current - and referenced - information on the mascots? Thanks. - EronTalk 20:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Makes sense now. Thanks very much. - EronTalk 00:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections
Ehm, I think you placed your vote for the same candidate twice by mistake. and. Cheers. ---Sluzzelin talk  19:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

FA of the Day
I realize normally, featured articles are not protected, as they are often impropved during the course of the day that they are featured, but, I just wanted to say, that I think this was really well done, on your part, lol. I think that particular article, would simply invite just a bit too much disruption, and I think your choice was a good one. (Not that you asked for my opinion, lol) Ariel  ♥  Gold  01:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Translink_Concession_Faresaver.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Translink_Concession_Faresaver.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 00:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Translink Concession Faresaver.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Translink Concession Faresaver.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 00:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)