User talk:Taylor.mm

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Helmut Oberlander, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Canadian  Paul  13:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

In regard to your changes, the first paragraph as previously written was a biased negative portrayal of this individual. There is no evidence he is a Nazi or war criminal. The sentences added are factually and has been sourced appropriately. As per page 14 of the 2009 FCA 330, EK10A was part of a force responsible for killing 2 million people. The previous wording was misleading. Other changes are due to inaccurate information. You cannot deport a Canadian citizen without first revoking their citizenship, and he is not wanted for trial in any other country. This is false information and has been removed. All information added is factual and creates a more balanced biographical page, please stop reverting my edits. Thank you.

November 2016
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Connormah (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)