User talk:Taylororci

December 2019
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Resting bitch face, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Taylororci. The Gaurdian article cited in support of that content makes no mention of you by name; in fact, it doesn't even mention "Broken People" by name, but does at least provide a link to the group's YouTube page where the video referred to in the article can be seen. (The YouTube page, by the way, says the group has two members, not one) Unfortunately, Wikipedia is going to need an independent reliable source so that your claim of being the person who created the video can be verified for the reasons given in Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. On a personal level, neither myself,, nor any Wikipedia editor for that matter probably has any reason not to take you at your word; Wikipedia as a project, however, simply doesn't work that way. So, if you can find some independent reliable source which clearly states that you were the one who made the video, then perhaps such information can be added to the article. If you do, and you're not sure how to add such a source, just follow the instructions given in Wikipedia:Edit requests and propose that the information be added at Talk:Resting bitch face. Please note that because you're trying to add content about yourself to a Wikipedia article, you're going to be considered to have a conflict of interest and thus expected not to add such content yourself.Finally, while I'm sure you meant no harm, please don't try to add this content again (particularly without the citation to a independent source that I mentioned above). You've already tried to do so twice and have been reverted twice; so, any further attempts run the risk of being seen as edit warring which could lead to your account being blocked. The best thing for you to do now would be to try and find the independent reliable source I mentioned above and then propose the change on the article's talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello this is terribly stressful-- please take a look at my interview with the Today show in the following link: https://www.today.com/health/bitchy-resting-face-real-kind-theres-hope-6C10462819. I'm also credited here : https://www.mic.com/articles/123341/when-resting-bitch-face-is-actually-just-another-word-for-social-anxiety and here in New York Magazine: https://www.thecut.com/2013/07/real.html. Please recheck the Broken People page. It's mine there is only my name. I added someone else briefly to help them with their job credits. Their name is gone now. To be clear I am not claiming I created the term, I created this video.
 * Hi again Talorci. There's no need to be stressful about this, but please understand that Wikipedia has certain policies and guidelines all editors are expected to do their best to adhere to. The fact you could go to that YouTube channel referenced above and remove that other person's name so easily means that you're really probably who you're claiming to be, but it also means that you would have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest with respect to anything written about you on Wikipedia. I appreciate you taking the time to dig up those sources, but now my suggestion to you would be to do the following:
 * Go to Talk:Resting bitch face
 * At the top of the page you should see a tab called "New section". Click on this tab to open the editing window.
 * In the editing window you'll two places that look like white boxes where you can add information. The "Subject/headline" is like the "Re" window for email and this is where you should add the title of your post. In this case, simply stating "Edit request" should be OK. The other box is where you want to add your request and any sources which support the change you like to make. So, this is where you want to add something along the lines of what you posted above. However, before you do that please add Template:Request edit to the top of this box (just copy and paste into the box) and then below that template add your request. make sure you explain that you are the creator of the video and are making the request so as to adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest editing.
 * Once you've add your request, please make sure that you WP:SIGN your request. The easiest way to do this is to add ~ to the very end of your post.
 * After you've done all of the above, click "Show preview" to check to make sure that everything is OK. If it is, click "Publish changes" and your post will become visible for others to say.
 * Now, all you need to do is wait for someone to answer your request. It might take a bit of time, but someone should get to eventually. Give it at least a day, and if nobody answers it by then, you can post a similar request at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. You should try to understand though that even if you do everything mentioned above properly, the consensus of other editors (particularly those who have been working on the article) might still be that you shouldn't be mentioned by specifically by name not because you didn't create the video, but rather because such information isn't encyclopedically relevant to the reader and might be viewed as a form of WP:Namechecking. The article is about the term and specifically about the video itself; so, it might place undue emphasis on the video if too much detail is given about it. Of course, things would be different if the article was specifically about you or the video, but that's not the case, Anyway, if you're request is declined, try not to take in personal; instead try and understand why and see if you can persuade those working on the article otherwise through further discussion on the article's talk page; it might be the case where the other content about your video in the previous section may need some rewriting so that a sudden mention of you by name makes sense in the context of the rest of the article. If you simply just say "Orci's video" and nothing else, then that will have very little meaning to anyone reading the article who knows nothing about you or the video. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)