User talk:Taylorradamm

Welcome!
Hello, Taylorradamm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stapler hemorrhoidopexy with mucopexy (SHM): A more effective procedure in patients with grade III Internal hemorrhoids (IH), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BiH (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

==Speedy deletion nomination of Stapler hemorrhoidopexy with mucopexy (SHM): A more effective procedure in patients with grade III Internal hemorrhoids (IH)==

A tag has been placed on Stapler hemorrhoidopexy with mucopexy (SHM): A more effective procedure in patients with grade III Internal hemorrhoids (IH), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Notability
I deleted the page for multiple reasons. First is that the page came across as promotional for the procedure. Articles must be written in a neutral tone that neither for or against something. Secondly, there was nothing to show that this specific version of stapled hemorrhoidopexy is notable enough to merit an article apart from the main article. You have to show coverage for this procedure to show how it passes notability guidelines- plus you'd have to show why this merits an article apart from the main topic. We almost never have articles for the myriad of different versions of a procedure. Finally, this came across as a potential copyright violation, as it looks like you cut and pasted much of the information from a medical journal. If this is the case, please understand that we CANNOT post any sort of material that has been posted elsewhere. As far as claims of it being useful, we cannot keep an article because it would be useful. It must pass notability guidelines. (WP:COPYVIO, WP:NOTADVOCATE, WP:GNG, WP:ITSUSEFUL) Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)