User talk:Tazsummers

The Dualers
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a site for fans to add non-encyclopedic material on bands. All your additions to this page, whether correct or not, were unreferenced. Please don't add them again without reliable and published third-party sources. Yours sincerely, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Response from Tazsummers:

Hey George,

I’m in the band...as in a musician in the band and I am also responsible for editing this page. All information is relevant and correct. If you wish to visit the Offical Facebook Page or Official Website and add the relevant reference information. I am a novice Wikipedia user and don’t know how to do this correctly. If you don’t wish to do this please stop editing it as we aren’t relevant you and what you do....

All the best,

Kindest Regards

Tazsummers

The Dualers
Hello. I see how angry you are getting. Please don't. My edits aren't personal, and you should assume good faith. I'll explain why your additions to the Dualers page are being removed. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Please try to find reliable third-party sources -- not the band's website, which clearly isn't third-party -- and remember that your edits will be reverted without them. Sorry. Best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 07:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Editing with a conflict of interest
Hello, Tazsummers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Dualers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at The Dualers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 22:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Dualers, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on The Dualers. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * As you have refused to adhere to Wikipedia's requirements regarding conflicts of interest, and have declared unequivocally that you intent to continue adding promotional content to The Duelers, I have blocked you from editing further.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)