User talk:Tbeckwi/sandbox

Peer Review by Christine
Really interesting topic! I noticed on the talk page that the article is a start-class on the quality scale and of mid-importance on a WikiProject, so there is plenty of room for you to improve the article. Based on the current state of the lead section, I would say that needs the most work. It lacks cohesion and a lot of the information included there could be built upon and moved to other subheadings within the article. There also is a need for more secondary or review sources, as most of the cited sources currently are primary peer-reviewed scientific journal articles.

Review Response
Thank you for your input Christine! Yes, the current article is mostly summaries that need to be tied together more cohesively and expanded upon. I feel like adding the necessary citations to it has been more tedious than I was initially expecting. I agree that I need fewer primary sources, it's just difficult because there's not a lot of secondary sources specifically covering the topic. Tbeckwi (talk) 13:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)