User talk:Tbhemingway

Perfect Black Swan
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Perfect Black Swan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.perfectblackswan.com/about.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Perfect Black Swan, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Perfect Black Swan appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Perfect Black Swan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Perfect Black Swan and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Perfect Black Swan with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Perfect Black Swan.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.  Ŵïllî§ï$2  ( Talk! / Cont. ) 23:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Germ (talk) 00:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Perfect Black Swan
A tag has been placed on Perfect Black Swan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mattinbgn\talk 04:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tbhemingway! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Toby Burke -

Reply
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~ There is no "complaint" &mdash; I simply deleted the text, but I haven't blocked recreation yet. The article had multiple problems  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I appeared to be an infringement of copyright material. The post above tells you what to do so that we can verify your ownership of the copyright and to release it under a Wikipedia-compatible licence.
 * It was advertising, full of unsourced spammy claims. acclaimed... beautiful set of images, just as haunting (if not more so) as the music... etc. These need independent reliable sources for verification
 * The article it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. Note that biographical articles of living people must be properly referenced for legal reasons

I looked at Toby Burke. The first ref just confirms that he exists, the second is dead. His notability seems questionable. There is no sourced information on chart success or sales, and the NME review lacks details to enable verification. You need to establish how he meets the notability criteria with independent verifiable sources.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Perfect black swan
A tag has been placed on Perfect black swan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)