User talk:Tbjablin

Hello Tbjablin, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
 * You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp as well.
 * Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 04:47, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Aha! okej I see, kind of funny when thinking of it - I mean the possibility of us two editing almost simultaneously :) Have a nice vening (if it's evening where you live taht is :) ) Damir Mišić 20:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Turkey vandal
It looks like the Turkey vandal is back, this time with the IP. --Khoikhoi 18:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC
 * Back again as . I've reverted all his edits except this one, in which he cited his source which covers for the total population, but not the other numbers. What should I do? --Khoikhoi 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Please help me out on the Turkey page. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 18:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes, he most certainly is. This is a bigger problem than I thought. --Khoikhoi 22:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

There is a real problem with this vandal, with continuous reverts on the Albanians page. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 17:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hey. The person who you just reverted wasn't the Turkey number vandal, it was a sockpuppet of User:Bitola. But thanks, the Turkey number vandal has gotten a user name since my last comment here, her name is Inanna. And yes, she still does the same thing on articles, it takes me and a few other editors to revert her. --Khoikhoi 02:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reformatting Michael Hagee
Thanks for reformatting Michael Hagee. Previously, it had not rendered correctly for me (using Firefox). &mdash;ERcheck @ 01:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

WP:SCHOOLS
Hi, concerning the merge, please see my notes on the talk page. If you don't believe the school is noteworthy, please take it to afd, as several editors have expressed problems with the merge. Part Deux 18:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Sartorial Choices
I'm confused about the policy are implementing here. Is the principle's pink suit non-notable? A pink-suited award-winning principle is pretty unusual (and hence notable?). The statement seems to be well supported. Further, his choice of tie here Dr. Barry Purvis of CASHS named state High School Principal of the Year, seems to indicate a certain pattern of behavior. Tbjablin 14:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Dr. Purvis' clothing choices may be rather disturbing, but encyclopedic? Maybe when we're ready to start the Barry Purvis article, there should be a section on his neckwear choices, and a separate article on the pink suit might be merited. Actually, his sartorial tastes only makes his selection as Principal of the Year all the more remarkable. Thanks for the dose of levity. Alansohn 14:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Java / C# / Kermet the Frog
I've been worried about the C# vs Java article for some time. It does seem to dwell too much on the current political situation between Free Software and Java, which is bordering on the religious at times. And that has led to a noticeable anti-Java bias. The important thing is that we get a good article, which reflects the highs and lows of both platforms without getting embattled in pedantic detail. I'm going to post a suggestion as to how the article can be forked into three, with two new articles dealing with the politics of Java and .Net -- I'd be grateful if you'd cast your eye over that and post a supporting comment if you approve. (As for being my sock puppet... hmm, I'm not really comfortable with my hand up anyone's back passage :)  JavaKid 10:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * A !!BIG!! thank you for cleaning up the split articles. My head was spinning so much with all the cut/paste action that I didn't have time to add links and check for anything other than basic spelling/grammar mistakes.  It didn't help that my first substantial draft simple got reverted by persons unnamed, rather than attempting to fix via edit: its soul destroying having to re-work the same text twice to write all the C# material to relate to .NET (yep -- finally got the message, it's in caps! :) simply because someone can't be bothered to do 'positive edits'.  What are the odds he'll just do a mass-revert again once he sees the latest changes?  I'm guessing its probably a strong cert, unfortunately.  Ho-hum!  Hopefully we can work things out...  :(  JavaKid 16:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Why are both paragraphs signed JavaKid? Isn't the first supposed to be Tbjablin? 24.65.79.192 21:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No, they are both by JavaKid. Tbjablin 23:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Three revert rule threats
The three revert rule isn't a shield that allows you to make any change you want to any article at any time without the risk of another editor repairing damage (if any). Your changes do need to meet wikipedia standards. If you want to seek mediation, I don't mind. 24.65.79.192 01:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Japanese name order
Re: your edit to Uehara Azumi, the Manual of Style states that all Japanese born since the Meiji era should be listed in GivenName FamilyName order. I'll ask an admin to fix this one, but, I thought it was something you may want to know for the future. Regards. Neier 05:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I just finished my other message though.  He may want to delete the other article, but, probably not. Neier 05:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

USVA emblems for headstones and markers
Hee, you were pretty quick on that edit, not often I get an edit conflict for an image I just uploaded. :) Thanks for helping keep WP current &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 00:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL, I guess one good edit conflict does deserve another. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 01:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Openlogo-nd-100.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Openlogo-nd-100.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 19:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Everyone here !!! you guys must all be like MAJOR nerds i mean disscusions on wikipedia LAAAAAMe im a prep and i dont even know why im talking on this o ya actually i do know ... TO MAKE FUN OF ALL U NERDS LOL KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK :) just idding i am a nerd and love wikipedia my name is mathew fagundo lol look me up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.182.79 (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)