User talk:Tblahout

Little context in Words that are nice to say
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Words that are nice to say, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Words that are nice to say is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Words that are nice to say, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Words that are nice to say itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The reason the article was deleted before was that it had no context. Imagine, for example, that someone stumbled on the article and tried to expand it; There was no indication of what the article was really about, aside that it had a list of words - no mention of the podcast! Articles really should make their context somehow clear, so that people don't end up just confused when they read the article.

My apologies if this has inconvenienced you. However, I'd really recommend looking at other articles and seeing how they are generally constructed, looking at the Manual of Style and other guidelines. it's generally recommended to prepare the article in advance (in user space, if necessary) to a state where it does have some context and other basic information, before posting it in the article space. Providing some context initially shouldn't be too hard.

Anyway, welcome to our highly complex world and happy editing. =)--wwwwolf (barks/growls) 07:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)