User talk:Tbonefrank

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duquesne Whistle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hunter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rough and Rowdy Ways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Murder Most Foul.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Justarandomamerican. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rough and Rowdy Ways without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Kind regards, Justarandomamerican (talk) Also, have a nice day! 02:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder Most Foul (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Me or Leave Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nettie Moore (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Not Dark Yet, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Love Sick and Time Out of Mind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

please take greater care when writing citation templates
I'm growing weary of seeing the same mistakes – not all your fault, because as a tool, visual editor is seriously flawed – but, you are responsible for all edits that you make.

For example, this citation from Silvio (song):

The citation is flawed in three ways:
 * 1. ve insists on adding https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/869908038 – url is reserved for links to a copy of the source that readers can actually read; WorldCat does not provide access to the source so url should be omitted (the information available through the WorldCat url is available through the oclc identifier link so url is redundant)
 * 2. ve, via WP:CITOID, gets parameter data from WorldCat. WorldCat is notoriously unreliable.  Jean-Michel Guesdon is wrong; Guesdon is an author so Jean-Michel Guesdon is correct.
 * 3. First edition contains extraneous text which the template detects and flags with an error message.  The correct form is: First

So, a correctly written template looks like this:

Please use care when writing citation template so that other don't have to cleanup after you.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Silviosingle.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Silviosingle.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dark Eyes (Bob Dylan song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calexico.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:SONGCOVER
Hi! Surely you can see that some of the cover versions you are adding don't meet WP:SONGCOVER? this ref is literally one sentence. this one is half a sentence. this one is even less.

Please do not add again unless appropriate sources are supplied. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

I do think those covers do meet WP:SONGCOVER standards. There are several other covers of "Jokerman" that don't meet the standards and I'm not bothering to try and post those on the page. I will continue to find new sources and repost the info regarding Veloso and Gilkyson. - Tbonefrank


 * But you admit the references so far are not sufficient? If you can provide other good sources, great. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveSickcommercial.png
Thanks for uploading File:LoveSickcommercial.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NotDarkYetvideo.png
Thanks for uploading File:NotDarkYetvideo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Most of the Time
Thanks for all your work on this and other Dylan articles. I'd like to try and get "Most of the Time" to Good Article status - would you like to be co-nominator? I'm happy to do the additional work, but you've definitely built a sound foundation. The Dylan song articles that I have previously nominated for GA are "Idiot Wind", "Where Are You Tonight? (Journey Through Dark Heat)" and "Tangled Up in Blue". Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words, Benny! I'd be happy to be co-nominator.
 * Great stuff. I've started adding to the article. Let me have any feedback, and I'll let you know when I think it's ready to nominate. I was there for the performance on February 7, 1990 mentioned by Heylin in his book - it was my first Dylan concert! Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * By way of a progress update, there are a couple more sources I want to look at, which I'm hoping to get hold of in the next week or so - particularly Ricks's Visions of Sin and the full version of the Williams book (as I can only see some pages on Google books). These should help with writing about the lyrics and interpretation. I also have a couple of other reviewer comments from the time of the Oh Mercy release to add in. The lead might need a little bit extra. Is there any other aspect of the article that you think needs work? Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I think there's enough content now. I'm not too sure about the Attwood source, and have put something at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Bob_Dylan to try and canvas views. If there's no reply to that after a couple of days then we can remove the tag and see what the GA reviewer thinks. I've had a go at making the language consistently American English but there may be some tweaks needed. Is there anything else that you think is required before we nominate it and see what a reviewer thinks about it meeting the Good article criteria? Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Benny! I can't think of anything else to add. That Attwood excerpt is solid gold - a lot of people have written about the music and a lot of people have written about the lyrics but he's the only one who talks about how they work together and, more specifically, how the music purposefully CONTRADICTS the lyrics - so I really, really hope it stays.
 * Hi, the article has been picked up by a GA reviewer - see Talk:Most_of_the_Time/GA1. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Fingers crossed!
 * I think that only the first nominator gets a talk page notice, so see User_talk:BennyOnTheLoose. Thanks! Regards. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:13, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Minx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fallen Angels (Bob Dylan album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Fox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Dylanchords
Hi! I think that it's quite clear that Dylanchords is user generated. See WP:UGC. You can not use the argument that other sources have not been removed. See WP:OTHERCONTENT. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The examples WP:UGC gives of "user generated" sources are blogs or social media websites. Dylanchords is not remotely similar to those examples.


 * You can literally see on the front page where it says "submitted by". It's the very definition of user generated.
 * I know you add heaps of great content on Dylan articles, but it's beginning to feel like you think you WP:OWN the articles. Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It seems pretty clear you won't listen to what I'm saying. I'm going to ask for a 3rd opinion. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You won't listen to me either. You ignored my point that Ostrem's site is not remotely similar to the other blogs and social media sites that WP:UGC defines as "user generated."


 * Obviously we're not getting anywhere here. It seems clear that users are providing the content to me, but I have been wrong before. I'll wait to see the result of the 3rd opinion. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Eyolf Ostrem, a musicologist with a PhD and a published author, is responsible for 95% of what's on Dylanchords (going back to the 1990s when he founded it). The information that I'm referencing from his site has to do with the keys that the songs are played in, which is useful information for people who care about music. I can check with a 3rd party as well if you'd like.


 * The 3rd opinion (WP:3O) is someone impartial, so no need. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I've posted here to discuss whether it is a reliable source. Feel free to contribute. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Nobody has argued that it is not a copyright violation. I've left the disputed posts there while a 3rd opinion was sought and while it was discussed as a reliable source. The onus is now upon you to show why is is not a copyright violation, and I feel justified in removing the link in the meantime. Please note, this only applies to links where the lyrics are displayed, not to separate posts made by eyolf. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Nobody has argued that it is a copyright violation either (including you). Your original justification for removing the source was that it wasn't "reliable." I feel justified in restoring it.


 * "The more I think about it, the more I think Doctorhawkes is correct here. While a fair use argument could certainly be mounted, there's no indication that there is any dispensation from any copyright holder to the site. Therefore discretion is the better part of valor, and we should avoid using it. I'd say it's largely broadly reliable, but unfortunately in s copyright danger zone."


 * Had a quick look online. If you're very keen to provide details of the key, I believe they can be found at MusicNotes, a licensed provider. like here https://www.musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0235845. Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Political World single cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Political World single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MurderMostFoulvideo.png
Thanks for uploading File:MurderMostFoulvideo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Rough and Rowdy Ways—please maintain 10 reviews in table form per Template:Album ratings
Hi. I notice that over the last year or more, you've been the main editor responsible for repeatedly restoring more than 10 reviews to Template:Album ratings. I don't know if it's been pointed out to you, but it is recommended to include no more than 10 in table form. The template documentation itself states this. While you can point out that is a "recommendation", this Dylan album is not such an exception that it should have more scores listed than most other album articles that have been looked after on Wikipedia. It was no more exceptionally popular with critics than multiple albums are every year. Please attempt to choose the 10 most representative and leave it at that. When they were removed the first time, you should have left it be.  Ss  112   21:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I restored more than 10 reviews to that table exactly one time (not "repeatedly"). I also disagree with your assertion that the album is not "an exception." It was the second highest-rated album of 2020 and is already considered a landmark album by many critics. I'm fine with keeping the number of reviews in the table at 10 for now (if only because the album is less than 2 years old). In the future, when its landmark status becomes irrefutable, it should be expanded. Tbonefrank (talk) 01:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Shadow Kingdom
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shadow Kingdom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shadow_Kingdom&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1157177635%7CShadow%20Kingdom%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)