User talk:Tbreneman

March - May, 2008
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. --24.21.106.174 (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --24.21.106.174 (talk) 16:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Your most recent theory regarding requirements for citations regarding secret societies documented in Wikipedia is under discussion at Talk:P.E.O. Sisterhood. Please revert your deletion of the material in question until a consensus of editors is reached. --24.21.106.174 (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --24.21.106.174 (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

P.E.O. Sisterhood
Hello. In writing this, I'm proceeding from the assumption that you are in communication with the various other editors who have removed sourced content from the P.E.O. Sisterhood article. I'm copying this message to all the editors who've recently attempted to censor the references to the meaning of the group's name.

I can tell you with a fair amount of confidence that if there is a campaign, formal or informal, to keep information out of the article simply because P.E.O. (or anyone else) doesn't want it there, it will fail. As attempts to subvert Wikipedia process and dictate the content of the article grow more insistent, they will draw greater attention from the Wikipedia community (the attention they've received so far is relatively minor). The number of editors patrolling the article for unexplained deletions will increase, and the deletions will be ever more short-lived. More often than not, the deletions will be corrected within minutes, if not seconds (as they were this time).

We welcome all editors who come to Wikipedia in good faith to help build the encyclopedia. Please consider becoming part of our community and working within our principles to improve the P.E.O. Sisterhood article. Dppowell (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)