User talk:Tbrittreid/Archive/2008/July

Edit-Warring at Doctor Fate
I would ask that you either provide a source that specifically says what you want it to or cease in reverting my edits. As has been also explained in the article discussion per our policies and guidelines, we are not allowed to make a connection that is not explicit. Connecting two bits of information (in this case being a quote from Timm saying one thing and your personal opinion connecting it to something else) is synthesis. I have endeavored to point this out to you in article discussion (as well as your seeming lack of interest in being polite), and it would appear that my requests and suggestions are being ignored. I urge you in the strongest possible terms to seek out the counsel of someone who understands more completely our synthesis policy. If you revert in uncited information, I will report you for edit-warring and specifically violating our verifiability policy. I am sorry that you have brought about the necessity of this warning, but understand that I will file the complaint if it becomes necessary. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  20:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You were warned. An incident report was filed in regards to this matter at AN/I. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  20:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Tbrittreid, this edit you made to the Doctor Fate article does not appear to be supported by source you listed. If you continue to edit war over this issue, you will be blocked. --Kralizec! (talk) 20:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I did not see any of this thread--and I do get automatically informed of new postings to my talk page whenever I'm in Wiki, of course--until just a couple of days ago, and did not read it in depth until now. Even though I have put up an altered version of my edit that apparently satisfies the two of you, it is not a concession that you are right and I am wrong. It is merely a concession that I will never get the two of you to understand that realizing 1+1=2 is not synthesis. Neither of you ever did anything but assert that my posting (which I did not initiate, by the way) constituted synthesis; you never explained how and why it supposedly did so. For a genuine example of synthesis, see here. So this warning, incident report and threat of blocking mean nothing to me. Ted Watson (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)