User talk:Tbsocrates99

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
In a recent edit summary, you wrote that "According to Wikipedia, if an addition to an article is not vandalism or false information, it is allowed." That is unequivocally false. I strongly recommend that you review the following policies or guides:


 * 1) What Wikipedia is not: This policy describes how Wikipedia "does not aim to contain all data or expression found elsewhere." It offers numerous examples of information that Wikipedia does not aim to include even if the information is found in reliable sources.
 * 2) Neutral point of view: There is a section of our foundational pillar of "Neutral point of view" that explicitly discusses "due and undue weight". The idea is that we should include information in articles in proportion to the weight given to that information in reliable sources.
 * 3) College and university article advice: This provides specific advice about the content of college and university articles, including what should and should not be included.

Additionally, you should also know that it's unacceptable to edit war with other editors to add or include information in an article. If you have a disagreement, you should discuss it in the article's Talk page. I strongly recommend you revert your edit while this is being discussed.

Finally, if you happen to have a relationship with the subject of an article then you should review our policies regarding paid editing and conflicts of interest. If you do have a potential conflict of interest, you should not edit the article directly but instead make suggestions and requests in Talk. ElKevbo (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)