User talk:Tbyrne706

You cannot remove that graf on grounds that the allegation was "unproven". It was reported in a reliable source. When I wrote that paragraph originally I tried to be very clear that the incidents were alleged to have happened, and at the time of the column had not been subjected to any fact-finding process. Believe me, I'd like to know very much how that turned out ... I wish Mr. Barry had written a followup column, but the Times has never posted a retraction or correction to the original column. I have tried to find if other sources reported anything further, but have not located anything.

I would really prefer to discuss this with you instead of having to make a request for protection or report you for edit warring. We don't remove material that is reliably sourced because it reports on allegations that were "unproven". I'm sure this was embarrassing for the church and most of the people involved but as I said I have yet to find any other coverage of the incident. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)