User talk:Tcarnevale

Welcome!
Hello, Tcarnevale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=638015384 your edit] to Relational database may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Many confusing or incorrect ideas in the original.  I can't do a complete rewrite, but some
 * a key made up of two or more attributes within a table that (together) uniquely identify a record. For example, in a database relating students, teachers, and classes.  Classes could be uniquely

Welcome, new Wikipedia editor! ... (Now, about "Relational databases"...)
Greetings Tcarnevale! I see that you just made your first edit, to Relational Database, and it got promptly reverted. I just wanted to drop you a line to thank you for your effort and to encourage you to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, despite this brutal introduction. You obviously are knowledgeable about databases, and we could use your help.

I'm guessing you are a bit miffed about the reversion, and I wouldn't be surprised if you haven't already written-off the idea of devoting any more time to Wikipedia. Please be patient with us. We are all volunteers, and many of us (probably like you) don't have a lot of time to devote to Wikipedia, so we make do by working in baby steps, gradually improving an article. Thus, most articles are always works in progress.

The editor who reverted your edit was quite correct in his comments: "Please post suggestions for improvement on the Talk page, not in the article."

So I encourage you to return to the article and either post your same edit to the Talk page or make another attempt at editing the article itself, improving it in some way.

You edited the article's introduction, and I happened to notice your edit only because I had made the previous edit and was following it. You might find it interesting to see the edits I made, compared to the way it was before. Here's a link to a comparison: Difference between revisions

Notice my comments to my edit: "Pretty much a complete rewrite of the introduction. (Have at it! :)"

I hope you will agree that my edit was an improvement over the previous state of the article. And you will understand that I realize it is still imperfect and can use your input to further improve it.

So I'm hoping you'll stick with it, return to improve "Relational database," and continue to contribute to Wikipedia for many years. All the best. Frappyjohn (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to OASIS operating system
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the OASIS operating system article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)