User talk:Tcdmisc

Trinity College Miscellany
I see that you are editing this article. I rolled back your addition of the names of editors since you did not include a reliable source to verify the information. When statements are made about living persons, the policy on biographies of living persons requires such references. If you have a good source for the information which verifies it, I or others would be happy to help format it as a proper inline reference. You can discuss it on the talkpage of the article if you have trouble with the formatting. Regards, Edison (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Trinity College Miscellany, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 18:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Trinity College Miscellany. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amortias (T)(C) 18:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Trinity College Miscellany shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Edison (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I really do not want to block you from editing, but I can and will if you persist in adding unreferenced information to this article. How do you know these persons are the new editors? Is it printed in the publication itself? What issue? Please give us something to work with here. Edison (talk) 04:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Tcdmisc", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)