User talk:Tcrvocbth

August 2017
Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maor Buzaglo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Higgs


The article Jonathan Higgs has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Lapablo (talk) 14:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Firm but Gentle moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Firm but Gentle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Firm but Gentle
Hello Tcrvocbth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Firm but Gentle for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 08:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Hat of Casts, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 14:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily Blue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Emily_Blue check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Emily_Blue?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Emily Blue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Blue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emily Blue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andise1 (talk) 16:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crème de menthe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crème de la crème ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cr%C3%A8me_de_menthe check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cr%C3%A8me_de_menthe?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Drafts
Howdy hello! I see that you recently moved Forebears.io out of draft space. However the article's sourcing was not appropriate, and you didn't cleanup the draft templates. If you'd like to review drafts, please visit Articles for Creation, and look at the requirements and processes for reviewing drafts. Generally, we suggest that users with less than 500 edits do not review drafts. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 04:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Firm but Gentle


Hello, Tcrvocbth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Firm but Gentle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Notability for songs
Hi. I put a notability tag on your draft article Draft:Aperture (song). Songs don't automatically qualify to have separate articles on Wikipedia. They are generally covered instead in articles about albums or artists. See WP:NSONG for the rules on when a song qualifies to have an article of its own. --Srleffler (talk) 16:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aperture (song)


Hello, Tcrvocbth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aperture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)