User talk:Tdp1001

October 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Jethro  B  23:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The thing that many people who come to this article and make edits like the one you did fail to understand is that what it is saying is not that there never was such a conspiracy but rather that the Protocols has been conclusively proven to be plagairized from another work and therefore is a literary fraud regardlesss of whether the plot it portrays ever existed or not. You should have seen a notice explaining as much when you editied the page. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Wow! Signal
Please stop adding that material back. While there may be some logic in it (I've actually studied this a bit myself), the way you are adding the material is a gross violation of WP:POV because it isn't verfified by reliable sources. We don't put our own opinions, or the opinions of other, in articles unless it is backed with quality sourcing material that is consistent with the addition. This is how we make sure we don't add pseudoscience into articles. Once it has been reverted out, it is up to YOU to go to the talk page and discuss, and to bring forth sourcing to back your claims. Several people have reverted you, so it isn't one persons opinion, but rather several who understand the policies that you don't. If you add it back, I will have no choice but to assume you are edit warring, which will result in a block. Since you have already been reverting many times, you should consider this your only warning. Please read WP:BRD to get a better understanding of how we settle content disputes around here. The policies on content exists for a reason, as quality and verification are our goals, not maximum content. Thank you. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 16:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)