User talk:Tdz2

Commercial use of Image:ThomasZweifelPhoto.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:ThomasZweifelPhoto.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:ThomasZweifelPhoto.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:ThomasZweifelPhoto.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:ThomasZweifel.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:ThomasZweifelPhoto.jpg. The copy called Image:ThomasZweifelPhoto.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 13:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thomas Zweifel
Hi, I noticed you've been editing the article on Thomas Zweifel. Based on your username, I think it's likely that you are in fact this person. I would advise you to read WP:COI if this is the case and note that in general editors should not work on articles about themselves. If you aren't Thomas Zweifel then please ignore me. :) --Chris (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Article about Thomas Zweifel
Hello. The article about you was deleted because it appeared purely promotional in nature. An encyclopedia article should be based on independent coverage in reliable sources, such as newspapers and magazines.

In general, people are discouraged from editing articles about themselves. See WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO, our guidelines concerning conflicts of interest and autobiographies.

If an unbiased encyclopedia article can be written about you using independent reliable sources, consider asking somebody else to write it in order to avoid the pitfalls described in the COI and AUTOBIO guidelines.

Regards. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)