User talk:TeaLynnM

November 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Craniocervical Instability, from its old location at User:TeaLynnM/sandbox/Craniocervical Instability. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 01:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craniocervical Instability has been accepted
 Craniocervical Instability, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! scope_creep (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Craniocervical_Instability help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Copy and pasting
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

http://www.thepainrelieffoundation.com/craniocervical-instability/

I know I wrote that
I know I’m the aurthor of that article. TeaLynnM (talk) 02:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christopher Martenson


A tag has been placed on Christopher Martenson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Christopher Martenson. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  D My Son  06:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Removal of speedy deletion tag on Christopher Martenson
Hi TeaLynnM, unfortunately due to Wikipedia guidelines authors of a Wikipedia page are prohibited from removing speedy deletion tags. For more info please see here at WP:CSD. If you disagree with the speedy deletion tag please do it on the articles talk page like you already have done. Thank you and if you need any help, please just leave a message on my talk page or ping me when replying. Happy editing! Edi 7* (Message Me! • Self Isolate!) 07:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Christopher Martenson
If you believe the deletion of Christopher Martenson as a result of Articles for deletion/Christopher Martenson was in error, then you will need to take it to Deletion review. You can not just ignore the AfD concensus and re-create the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)