User talk:TeacherJass

April 2018
Hello TeacherJass. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TeacherJass. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.  Velella  Velella Talk 12:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

A note

 * I feel that you are fundamentally confused about the fact of our's being an encyclopedia, rather than your own website or a yellow-pages-directory or some insider-magazine that will digest whatever stuff gets thrown at them.


 * Frankly, have you ever read any printed reputable encyclopedia, which states anything of the sort of
 * about any subject?
 * about any subject?
 * about any subject?
 * about any subject?


 * And, we only cover those information that has been covered by other reliable and intellectually independent sources.No reader gives a flying fuck about how innovative or environment friendly or customer-friendly or efficient your company is.

Best, ~ Winged Blades Godric 09:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * So, unless you manage to shed your promotional-attire, (thus not causing any further nonsense-edits), your wiki-life is likely to be of a quite short span.