User talk:TealPenguinFoot/sandbox

I can't get the reference section to stay together above the external links section. I'm not sure why. Every time I move it and save it, it just reverts back.

Peer Review
Overall, the article seems to fit very well into the style of Wikipedia. The opening sentence seems to clearly define what Hope Spots are. I think the use of the quote is good, but I think you might want to try to move it to the side in its own box.

Another thought might be to create a section about the more specific characteristics of Hope Spots, similarity to how the nomination process has its own section. You already discuss there traits, but having its own section may make it easier to find.

You also discuss a Google powered map of Hope Spots. It might be interesting to include an image of this if possible. You could also consider having an external link to it, similar to how the Marine spatial planning article does with its "tools" section. I see that you have the link at the bottom of the page, but it kinda gets lost there and seems like a good resource to have easily available to people.

The sources used seem reliable and appropriate. The list format of the Hope Spots also seems very well organized. Pws97 (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)