User talk:Team sunshine

Welcome!
Hello, Team sunshine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zealand pharma, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Zealand pharma


A tag has been placed on Zealand pharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I was about to accept but I do have to ask first: do you have any connection with the Zealand Pharma company, personally? Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Nope - neither professional or private, only by observation, but are very interested in the medical developments in their pipeline etc since it has great potential especially within obesity, which is why some of the biggest players like Eli Lilly, Sanofi and Boehringer Ingelheim are closely working with them and funding them (these companies have a wikipage) and Zealand Pharma has had a ton of international articles regarding its drugs development from sources such as Bloomberg, copcap, drugs.com, Nasdaq etc. which is all part of the article I wrote. I do really not see any conflict with advertising or other G11 related issues, but if people feel like it, it should be open so that other people can contribute with their knowledge so i am not the only one. No wonder but I think it makes absolutely no sense not to have this page since it is a international drug company, which is the second biggest in the world in drugs to type 2 diabetes and it has a very large amount of second and third hand descriptions of its medical contributions and its a public listed company. If Novo Nordisk, Lundbeck, Sanofi, Genmab etc have a wikipage (for good reasons) then Zealand Pharma should have one aswell. If anyone can help me both with the article and making my username unblocked please do so. As mentioned I will of course be willing to change the username, so it does not sound like a group of people. Team Sunshine Team sunshine (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Question re sockpuppetry
What is your relation to the following accounts User:Isabellalo1904, User:Free4fear, User:Ak1998? I find it odd that four seemingly "new" accounts are each posting/editing the same set of heavily promotional articles related to the Kolind family or other Danish topics. I won't say too much here due to WP:OUTING but there seems to be a connection to the PR business and paid Wikipedia editing. Any admin can email me for links. Some of the articles have already been deleted because they are so promotional. Note I have also discussed this with admin User:DGG. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:00, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Wow, take it easy... I have no connection with any of those and have never encountered them in any way!!! I have never contributed to any thing with the Kolind family and as far I know they are just a rich family which does not belong on wikipedia, but honestly I dont know much about them. But yes it is true that Lars Kolind has been a boardmember at Zealand Pharma at some point (dont know when) but that would never belong in a Wikipedia articles since he is just one out of maybe 30 persons through time. He has been a board member on shit loads of companies in the medical field. But that is completely irrelevant. What is not irrelevant is that I made a good, neutral and well-documented article on a well-known medical research company which has contributed to worldwide treatment of diabetes 2. There have been so much about its medical contributes during the last couple of years so I collected sources and wrote a article which in every way is neutral. And this resulted in a close down of the article and a blocking of my user?? That is simply not fair. Btw, what parts of the article are promotional??? and could we please do this the wikipedia way where other can rewrite, add and contribute if they have sources that document that things are to be different?! This is kind of frustrating.. Team sunshine (talk) 18:37, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Response
Then why did you edit the Lars Kolind page here, if you say you "never contributed to any thing with the Kolind family" and this information "would never belong in a Wikipedia article"? Logical Cowboy (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Because I searched Zealand Pharma and found the articles where it was and added the link. Isnt this what you are suppose to do? Deleted the Lars Kolind article if thats the irrelevant. I also added Zealand Pharma to the medicon valley article because the official medicon valley sites states that Zealand Pharma is part of it. Why is this a problem? If there is trouble with paid people writting about Kolind then delete/edit the articles where he is part of it. He was never a part of the Zealand Pharma article. I am just accepting that he was a board member at once, which i found out when I made the wiki search on Zealand pharma.. Trust me I am truthfull and I seriously dont get what the kolind things has to do with the user blockade or article. Its not part of it but a hyperlink to an existing page which has Zealand Pharma mentioned.. Team sunshine (talk) 19:25, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment If you (or anyone else) recreates an article about Zealand Pharma, I will immediately send it to WP:AfD. Having looked at the sources, I don't see how it meets WP:CORP. Many types of external links (press releases, simple profile pages, mentions in a court document) do not meets 3rd-party, non-trivial coverage requirements described in WP:RS and WP:CORP. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 19:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay. that I can not understand and I would like someone other to look them through who is not biased by this Kolind mild thing that I all of the sudden got thrown into. Just for the record, I have absolutely nothing to do with neither the usernames or paid kolind activity or anything related to this! And I do not have connections with Zealand. I simply collected data and wrote the article and if the sources collected are not enough then thats fair but then please contribute by informing me why this external sources from international newspapers, public trial agencies and official financial listing information is not sufficient? That would be of great thanks.. and please remove this user blockade.. Team sunshine (talk) 20:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * ( Non-administrator observation ) I just want to let you know that you don't have to use for every comment you make while you're blocked. One is enough.   Anon 126   (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 22:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ( Administrator note ) I have removed the unblock templates from around the response above and indented accordingly. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)