User talk:Teamjenn

My talk page

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits  could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Regardless that you removed it, it is absolutely inappropriate to make edits such as this. Please refrain from posting your personal opinions.'' Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

List of 81st Academy Awards In Memoriam tribute honorees
As someone with at least ten edits of 81st Academy Awards, you might want to comment at Featured list candidates/List of 81st Academy Awards In Memoriam tribute honorees/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twitch Film
A tag has been placed on Twitch Film requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 04:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I have added some references to Twitch Film, and removed the speedy delete tag. However, additional independant reliable sources would improve the article. If you cna provide any, please consider doing so. DES (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Systematic removal of images I have placed
Please stop and discuss this for a moment. I contend that the images I've added are useful to visitors. They offer a view of non-Western examples of the topic, and such images counter the systemic bias present at English Wikipedia. Please, let's discuss this before you continue. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hutong
Sorry to make a fuss, and I do see [your point. The tricky thing is actually getting a picture of a hutong. Unless it's an aerial view, all pictures are lanes etc. in hutongs. It's like describing a picture of an elephant's toe with the caption "elephant".

I've been in plenty of Beijing and Haikou hutongs, and they are quite the same. Considering the definition in the article, as well as other sources, why do you say "hutong-like" instead of "hutong"? Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hutong is just a lane, and its just a matter of a different name. It largely depends on local customs.  I'm sure there are many areas in various parts of China or even countries around the world that look just like that, but the term hutong is usually only used for those in Beijing.  Now, if that lane in Haikou is actually called a hutong by the locals or if there's a sign, then its a different business.--Teamjenn (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I guess that makes sense. I've always (perhaps mistakenly) felt that the term also applies to the lanes, collectively. I trust your knowledge and judgement. Let's leave it as "hutong-like". Thanks for hearing me out. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Removal/replacement of images
I gather you are going through my image uploads or contribs, as you seem to be removing or swapping images I added. I'm not sure I agree with your judgement. I appreciate you allowing my reversions without response. Now, we are at Cargo net. I must say that I do not agree with your choice which favours a higher resolution image over an image that more clearly shows the topic. I have posted at cargo net talk. Let's get some input please before you continue to go through my image placements. Maybe you are right. Let's see what folks say at cargo talk, please.

Also, may I ask why you have picked my images/contribs to focus on? Are you concerned with how I do things? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I just saw this and thought I would also chime in. Teamjenn, I'm sure you mean well, but "higher resolution" is not always the single criterion for deciding on an image.  In this case, we have an example where your judgment could use some refining.  If you examine the photograph that you removed, we find that, even if it is at a lower resolution, it is still superior due to its composition, lighting, and depiction of the subject.  Please give these types of decisions a bit more thought in the future.  Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012
I see that you are interested in Chinese articles. Consider joining us. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)