User talk:Teammm/Archive 4

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 05:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Wtf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.33.172.246 (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ftW Teammm $talk email$ 20:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Bisexuality article -- links for Homosexuality in ancient Greece and Homosexuality in ancient Rome
This is not needed how, considering this, this and this? Notes like those keep instances like that from happening again, or at least have a better chance of making the editor address the matter on the talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 21:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I pointed the editor to this section and to the article's edit history. Flyer22 (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Inaccurate edit to Same-sex marriage in Minnesota
I have reverted your revert and initiated a discussion at Talk:Same-sex_marriage_in_Minnesota.

Minnesota is the thirteenth U.S. state and fourteenth U.S. jurisdiction (including Washington D.C) to legalize marriage between same-sex couples, The way the sentence is currently written, there is nothing to indicate that it is about the current amount legal. Unless you want to completely re-write the sentence, do not revert my edit Thegreyanomaly (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Webinar / edit-a-thon at the National Library of Medicine (NLM)
Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!

On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.

Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.

If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho (talk) 05:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Have time on Saturday?
I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Harej (talk) 03:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human Rights Campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenneth Cole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, June 15!
Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 19:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

First entry of a Biography should merit mention of full name !
First entry of a Biography should merit mention of full name ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bammesk (talk • contribs) 19:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You're right. But, the lead section is considered the first mention and uses the Full Name. Subsequent sections do not use the full name, only the last name. See examples here, here, and here. Also, there's no need to yell. Thanks. Teammm $talk email$ 20:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your edits and updates. External link "http://michellechamuel.com" is down / having problems. Can I/we add it after it comes back online ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.1.240 (talk) 16:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Yea, you can add it back when it's running. I didn't know it was only temporary. Teammm $talk email$ 00:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

ditto :)
Thanks back to you :) I am new, trying to figure things out and contribute. I appreciate your experience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bammesk (talk • contribs) 02:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, you're doing a good job. I hope you decide to stay for a while! There's a lot that can be done. ;) Teammm $talk email$ 03:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

a question
I think the answer is no....but, Regarding Michel Chamuel's wiki page, can Discography items be directly linked to their corresponding websites ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bammesk (talk • contribs) 21:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you mean an iTunes page where it is sold, for example, no. You can cite a reference from a website that talks about the album, though. Teammm $talk email$ 04:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

your input is needed please
I took out a reference, noting these concerns, in short "hearsay",

21:57, 18 June 2013‎ Bammesk  Biography: unreliable source 1-unknown cousin, 2-unknown Egyptians, 3-dated Jun 18 (U.S. organization), posted & Wiki-referenced June17 (U.S. time) ! 4-claims "attended congregation" per previous article "I managed to find out". Unreliable source.

The reference gets re-inserted by other contributors. What is the course of action ? Thanks you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bammesk (talk • contribs) 04:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Which article are you talking about? Also, remember to sign your comments on talk pages by using 4 tildes (~) after your comment, so people will know who to respond to. Teammm $talk email$ 04:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

this article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bammesk (talk • contribs) 04:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

please review my last edit
On Michelle Chamuel page, please review my last edit, by Bammesk. I removed a reference that I thought is unreliable. However, I am not familiar with all guidelines and if I made a mistake, please undo my edit. Reference under question is Thanks you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bammesk (talk • contribs) 04:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was good that you removed that source. It seems that it is more like a blog post and the writer admits that he's not sure about his information. The source isn't reliable to support her ancestry. Teammm $talk email$ 05:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, I appreciate it. You'll get the hang of things pretty easily I'm sure. Just look through the links that I put on your talk page and you'll catch on to the basics. You can feel free to ask me questions, and I'll try to respond as quickly as possible. Sometimes, it may not be right away. For instance, I'm on my way to sleep now. lol Teammm $talk email$ 05:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I see you signed your name this time. Great! <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 05:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, one more thing. When you explain why you have removed something and the other editor adds it back, write them a message on their talk page to further explain your reasoning and why it's unreliable. This is in order to not do what we call edit war. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 05:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Your Comment About Revising Michelle Chamuel Entry
Reference is made to this comment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Teammm&diff=prev&oldid=560559684

My name is Nate Bloom. I write a weekly or bi-weekly column on Jewish celebritiee for the American Israelite of Cincinnati; the Detroit Jewish News; the New Jersey Jewish Standard; JWeekly of San Francisco. I write a similar column for Interfaithfamily.com I also appear in four small Florida Jewish papers monthly. My journalism is cited repeatedly by Wikipedia. I have been cited in scholarly books. Been interviewed on related subjects by the Washington Post, JTA, etc. In my JWeekly column, published on June 7, 2013, I covered Michelle Chamuel and reported she is Jewish: http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/68765/celebrity-jews67/ and I mentioned she was reportedly of Egyptian descent. At that point, that was what I could gather from secondary sources. I also found two synagogue bulletins from an Amherst congregation that mentioned her mother and her attended that synagogue for at least a period of 3 years. Nobody in a print newspaper, with limited space, would mention a source like that. Just the fact that they attended. This column item prompted a call from a San Francisco cousin of Chamuel. She confirmed both parents were Jewish--Egyptian born Jews--confirmed Michelle's mother was a physician and that the family were "Karaite" Jews. This I reported for Interfaithfamily.com

This was all denigrated as "unsure" and a blog post. I had asked a friend, who is skilled at editing Wiki, to post a link this morning to my Interfaithfamily.com article. This he did. Traffic poured in until you guys decided, without checking who I was--or really reading the article--to remove it. Then my friend got other sources to back what I reported and restored the link to my article. Everything he added was based on my original journalism--everything in my article was correct as the sources he gathered---confirmed. I am appalled by this cavalier treatment. Years ago, when I edited a site on famous Jews--I woke up one morning and saw the information I had gathered over years had been lifted by Wikipedians, without credit, and stuck on Wiki. I learned to live with that.

Two weeks ago, I reported Chamuel was Jewish. But you guys didn't have that until today. You probably still wouldn't have it except for the circumstances described above. Why don't you surprise me and restore my credit? Okay.Natebloom (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

http://www.interfaithfamily.com/arts_and_entertainment/popular_culture/Interfaith_Celebrities_Michelle_Chamuel_and_Former_Child_Stars.shtml


 * Thank you for contacting me. You're right, I didn't even read the whole article. I stopped after the first paragraph. (it's very late here and I'm sleepy) After reading your article I see the report of the conversations you had with her relative. I don't see why it can't be used as a source when others have also reported it as well. Sorry if I offended your work, it wasn't my intention. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 06:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Join us this Sunday for the Great American Wiknic!
Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC. To unsubscribe from future DC area event notifications, remove your name from this list.

Harej (talk) 15:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you. Excellent work. Bammesk (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

for review
Given the subject’s statements in the 2010 A.E. interview, it may be best to revert these changes, and separate personal life from career, until further interviews. I trust your judgment on this matter. What do you think? Bammesk (talk) 00:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thank you! <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 20:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)]]

Windsor case vs. USA
i've noticed that your botscript reverted the edit (which was itself a revert) of the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_States_v._Windsor#undue_weight_of_dissents

it is sad that otehrwise good content is being trimmed because the other POV doesnt have time to either add to the discussion ir to point out why the existing content is not conscise (seems like 10 lines of content without the quotations are not a lot to add). Furthermore, the existing edit which your script reverted back to deleted about 85% of original citations direct from the Supreme justices' report.

You wrote you don't have time to edit or summarize, which i understand, but dont let others cut it down just because you dont have time to do anything about it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.85.45 (talk) 06:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * There's a process that needs to be followed. Taking 8,000 characters worth of content directly from the court opinion and posting it on Wikipedia with fused in commentary of your own is the highest level of undue weight imaginable. If you are passionate about adding in the content of the dissents properly, then you need to summarize the notable points and have reliable sources attached to the commentary. I don't have a POV problem. You have a misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is, which is not a free-for-all dump for information. I would recommend coming to a an agreement, at the talk page, on the major points of the dissent that can be summarized to have readers get the complete meaning of what it says. I can try to help if I have time but I'm busy at the moment. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 06:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Widen the page
The whitespace diappears if you have room for the pictures. Take it to Talk if you really want to discuss. Wolfram.Tungsten (talk) 00:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 00:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Stonewall riots
You're welcome. If you watch that article, please jump in and help when you see a problem. As you may know, the principal author is no longer active on Wikipedia, and it's a challenge keeping it up to FA grade without her and her sources. Rivertorch (talk) 17:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I sure will, no problem. ;) <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 00:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mariah Carey
With all due respect to a fellow editor, none of us can unilaterally declare that Time Inc., the publisher of People, as well as CBS News and the New York Daily News are invalid, unreliable sources. We can't say, "People is incorrect." People would say, "We have professional journalists and fact-checkers." Same with CBS News and, though they probably don't have separate fact-checkers, the Daily News.--Tenebrae (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to use the talk page to come to consensus before you change the article. Provide your sources and changes and other editors will provide theirs. It is best to provide up-to-date references because they will be given greater deference. Thank you. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 19:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * In fact, there is a discussion, at Talk:Mariah Carey. No consensus was reached on either date, so we can't put our own preference in. And the People cite is up-to-date, so I ask that we continue this debate in good faith and not make misleading suggestions.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)


 * That discussion includes another editor noting that per Parade, another highly reliable source, as recently as 2011 gave 1969. http://www.parade.com/celebrity/hollywood-wire/2011/03/28/mariah-carey-early-contractions.html. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Believe me, I'm well aware of what we can and cannot do. I've listed a number of the most reliable sources on the talk page and look forward to your review of the content. I agree your efforts are in good faith, but the content is just not accurate given the weight of the sources to the contrary. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 20:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —<font size="2" face="Courier New" color="#6F00FF"> Indian: <font color="#FF033E">BIO  · [ <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#1C1CF0">ChitChat ] 03:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll just opt out of maintaining the page. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 05:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Dispute comment
Hi. If it's no bother, could you weight in on this discussion about what I am asserting is a non-neutral revision by another editor? An outside opinion would be greatly appreciated. These POV disputes are pretty contagious with music articles LOL. Dan56 (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Along with misrepresenting my talks with him to you, Dumaka is now threatening to restore his baseless revision to the article. Dan56 (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I see. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 22:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Team
I ve been facing issues with my page.. I need ur help.. My DOB is 24-12-89 which keeps changes.. So I need u to lock it n can check facts with me.. N the film 'Chitkabrey is a Festival film' so in place of Festival Film its topless scene.. Its humiliating n I would need ur help pls.. N I wish u can take some action n lock things or I will ve to take legal support cos I don't need certain thing which demeans me written on a public domain.. Pls do make changes hope to get ur mail I'd where I or my official team can be in touch with u.. Waiting for ur concern

Regards

Akshara gowda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.18.239.131 (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * You can speak to an administrator. I am not one. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 21:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you User: ronhjones
Thank you sir For helping me correct my dob and also remove the contorversial par 'topless scene'... I would Request 2 more things from the Team

A) pls help me remove the links '4,5 and 6' along with this things mentioned 'She was also seen and appeared topless [4] in Chitkabrey - The Shades of Grey which was promoted as the "boldest Indian film made".[5][6]' pls.. Its a humble request.. As it was all written to malign my image n anyways its all over place atleast wanna keep the PERSONAL PAGE as a neat one.

B)pls I wud request Teammm to secure my page.. Or atleast the Info which is absolutely true and confirmed by me in person if not the whole page..As people who are trying to demean my image won't be able to mess with it

Regards Akshara Gowda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.18.239.131 (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

URGENT REPORT
For helping me clean my page.. Its a humble request if u cud help me secure my page and also sir I wud request u to clear the controversial part 'She was also seen and appeared topless [4] in Chitkabrey - The Shades of Grey which was promoted as the "boldest Indian film made".[5][6]' As it is publicaly demeaning my image which I don't need(personal request) n is a false information(especially seen and appeared topless)which u can seen in link.. I'm waiting for u to handle n secure my page

User:Murrallli Is been reporting wrong info n being abusive not just abt me but to lot of others as 'puja gupta'(u can check it urself as she wasn't part of Chitkabrey film) page as well.. Sir its a humble request if u cud 'block him' from editing without checking the facts n clear those wrong info links from my page!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.18.239.131 (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not an administrator on Wikipedia and do not have the rights to protect a page. You can request it at requests for page protection. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 21:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * You're welcome! <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 00:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

about official site
Thanks for the overlink guideline. About this I don't know which one is the official site. The earliest site insertion is here so that might be the official one. I am just saying.Bammesk (talk) 19:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. The one with her name in it is not run by her, it's a fan-created site. The other site is run by her personally. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 21:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Sullivan
Thanks for your request. I have begun a discussion on the talk page as you asked. I would note that the previous discussion suggested that led to the current formulation specifically said "I think we might be onto something here. If there aren't any complaints in the next day or so, I think we should do this." My observations disagreeing with that were posted in that thread within ten hours, so I don't really think that the "consensus" had been as fully achieved as you suggested. That said, I believe we can find a good way forward, one more in line with SPS and RS policy. Capitalismojo (talk) 23:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

a question, can this be done?
I added a cover song to Chamuel's discography called "when the world was young". Can I add the code below to this page, the song's page ? There has to be value (worthy of note) in renewing the composer's work after 35 years. The code makes a new section for "contemporary recordings". code: ==Contemporary recordings== Bammesk (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Michelle Chamuel - released on SoundCloud (2012)


 * I would say no because it doesn't meet WP:MUSIC requirements. I would classify the cover as trivial because it hasn't received sufficient discussion from reliable secondary sources or gained any notoriety at all. If you want to include that in her biography, however, it may be usable. Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 02:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I understand, thanks.Bammesk (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 02:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

for review
Please review. Currently the word Chamuel is directed per the following : I do not see why Chamuel should redirect to Camael. Why should it not redirect to Michelle Chamuel? Another less relevant consideration is that the Camael article gets 90 hits a day, versus Michelle Chamuel article with 300 hits a day. I appreciate your input. Bammesk (talk) 04:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Chamuel - is a redirect page as per #REDIRECT &#91; &#91; Camael &#93; &#93;
 * Camael - is an article, its lead states that Camael is also known as Kamuel, Chamuel, Camiel, Camniel
 * Seven Archangels - is an article, in its lead section there is a hyperlink to Chamuel as per &#91; &#91; Chamuel &#93; &#93;
 * The “Seven Archangels” article is the only one that hyperlinks to Chamuel. Other than that there are no mentions of Chamuel on any pages.
 * Of course there are several articles that mention Camael and hyperlink directly to the Camael article.

Is this a reasonable solution:
 * create a page called "Chamuel (angel)" that redirects to Camael
 * create a page called "Chamuel (singer)" that redirects to Michelle Chamuel
 * edit the current page of "Chamuel" so that it becomes a disambiguation page listing the above 2 choices.
 * modify articles that redirect to "Chamuel" (such as the Seven Archangels article) so that they redirect to "Chamuel (angel)" page. Bammesk (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I created a disambiguation page for Chamuel <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 16:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) Bammesk (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Mariah Carey
Hi, Teammm. As we've been discussing at Talk:Mariah Carey, I've just done a first pass on that talk page of a Joan Crawford-stye footnote about Carey's birth date. Hope you have a chance to see it and comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

for review
On this page, I request a change from existing/old reference to new reference. Advocate for old reference posted here, and. Review shows old reference has two mistakes and a COI. "attended congregation for at least several years" is incorrect per. Advocate states attendance is based on two bulletins, can very well be two attendances three years apart. "In Egypt, I was told…" is incorrect, per the author had not been in Egypt as of June 4. Also advocate states the source is not anyone in Egypt. Lastly, advocate admits he has a COI, funding benefit to a non-profit. Given old reference discusses personal information, has mistakes and COI, and is used on a BLP, I request that it be replaced with the new reference. I appreciate your input.Bammesk (talk) 02:40, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Good morning. I would be BOLD, make the change, place this explanation on the talk page, and write in the edit summary that you explained your change on the talk page. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 12:58, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reviews. Bammesk (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hawaii SSM
Thank you for your edit, I have no problem with Hawaii going blue, I just want to make sure the article is not misleading, or confusing to readers. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, you were right though. When I read how it said that Hawaii is already included in those states that "issue marriage licenses for same-sex couples", it needed to be corrected. Separate sentences cleared that up. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 23:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Happy New Year! <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 00:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Ditto! Bammesk (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

LGBT rights in Russia
Hello. I am struggling to understand why you [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_Russia&diff=next&oldid=587526487#cite_note-34 reverted] the article to an earlier version. Vis-à-vis [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_Russia&oldid=587709632#Bans_on_.22homosexual_propaganda.22 #Bans on "homosexual propaganda"], most of the sources you revert back to (e.g. ) are from June 2013, and so cannot possibly support the article's claim that the law had been passed on 30 July. Your revert also removed the Cite Russian law sources I had [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LGBT_rights_in_Russia&diff=586505609&oldid=586340824 added] earlier. Again, why do this? Thank-you. <font color="#006600">It Is Me Here  <font color="#CC6600">t / <font color="#CC6600">c 23:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for bringing this to my attention. This is definitely an error on my part. My intention was only to change the title of a particular section back to what it was. Apparently, I was rushing and pressed the wrong button and didn't notice. Sorry! I'll fix what I unintentionally reverted. <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 04:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Meetups coming up in DC!
Hey!

You are invited to two upcoming events in DC:


 * Meetup at Capitol City Brewery on Saturday, January 25 at 6 PM. Please join us for dinner, drinks, socializing, and discussing Wikimedia DC activities and events. All are welcome! RSVP on the linked page or through Meetup.
 * Art and Feminism Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, February 1 from Noon – 5 PM. Join us as we improve articles on notable women in history! All are welcome, regardless of age or level of editing experience. RSVP on the linked page or through Meetup.

I hope to see you there!

(Note: If you do not wish to receive talk page messages for DC meetups, you are welcome to remove your username from this page.)

Harej (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

An article discussion that might be of interest to you...
Hey Teammm, In case you might be interested in a conversation going on about Paul vs: Jesus re Homosexuality, please check out: Jesus' silence on homosexuality. Any insights you might have in such a discussion would be welcome. Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

thanx

 * Copy and paste this code:


 * P☮ace- ♥  -33756
 * into the Signature field in your Preferences: Remember to check the box that says: "Treat the above as wiki markup." <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 00:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * omg thank u so so much if i ever need to change it (not like i will) i will ask u. Thank u soo soo much!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peace33756 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * ok :) P☮ace-  ♥  -33756  01:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC) and thank u. again!!!!!
 * No problem! I hope to see you become a valuable contributor on Wikipedia. Read up on the editing basics and start improving the encyclopedia wherever you can! ;) <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 03:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Coming up in February!
Hello there!

Our February WikiSalon is coming up on Sunday, February 23. Join us at our gathering of Wikipedia enthusiasts at the Kogod Courtyard of the National Portrait Gallery with an optional dinner after. As usual, all are welcome. Care to join us?

Also, if you are available, there is an American Art Edit-a-thon being held at the Smithsonian American Art Museum with Professor Andrew Lih's COMM-535 class at American University on Tuesday, February 11 from 2 to 5 PM. Please RSVP on the linked page if you are interested.

If you have any ideas or preferences for meetups, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/DC.

Thank you, and hope to see you at our upcoming events! Harej (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

DC Meetups in March
<div style="background: #EFFDF5; padding:3em; font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif; font-size:110%;"> Happy March!

Though we have a massive snowstorm coming up, spring is just around the corner! Personally, I am looking forward to warmer weather.

Wikimedia DC is looking forward to a spring full of cool and exciting activities. In March, we have coming up:


 * Evening WikiSalon on Wednesday, March 12 from 7 PM – 9 PM. Meet up with Wikipedians for coffee at the Cove co-working space in Dupont Circle! If you cannot make it in the evening, join us at our...
 * March Meetup on Sunday, March 23 from 3 PM – 6 PM. Our monthly weekend meetup, same place as last month. Meet really cool and interesting people!
 * Women in the Arts 2014 meetup and edit-a-thon on Sunday, March 30 from 10 AM – 5 PM. Our second annual Women in the Arts edit-a-thon, held at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. Free lunch will be served!

We hope to see you at our upcoming events! If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page.

— Harej (talk) 05:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

An exciting month of wiki events!
<div style="background: #EFFDF5; padding:3em; font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif; font-size:110%;"> Hello there,

I am pleased to say that April will be a very exciting month for Wikipedia in Washington, DC. We have a lot of different events coming up, so you will have a lot to choose from.

First, a reminder that our second annual Women in the Arts Edit-a-Thon will take place on Sunday, March 30 at the National Museum of Women in the Arts.

Coming up in April, we have our first-ever Open Government WikiHack with the Sunlight Foundation on April 5–6! We are working together to use open government data to improve the Wikimedia projects, and we would love your help. All are welcome, regardless of coding or editing experience. We will also be having a happy hour the day before, with refreshments courtesy of the Sunlight Foundation.

On Friday, April 11 we are having our first edit-a-thon ever with the Library of Congress. The Africa Collection Edit-a-Thon will focus on the Library's African and Middle East Reading Room. It'll be early in the morning, but it's especially worth it if you're interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of African topics.

The following day, we are having our second annual Wiki Loves Capitol Hill training. We will discuss policy issues relevant to Wikimedia and plan for our day of outreach to Congressional staffers that will take place during the following week.

There are other meetups in the works, so be sure to check our meetup page with the latest. I hope to see you at some of these events!

All the best, James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 01:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Stories
Hi Teammm,

My name is Victor Grigas, I'm a Wikipedian and I work for the Wikimedia Foundation as a storyteller and video producer. In my role, I gather stories to share with the world about our community and I was hoping you might be interested in speaking with me over the phone, by Skype or other means. I can answer any questions you may have :) Victor Grigas (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Two edit-a-thons coming up!
<div style="background: #EFFDF5; padding:3em; font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif; font-size:110%;">

Hello there!

I'm pleased to tell you about two upcoming edit-a-thons:


 * This Tuesday, April 29, from 2:30 to 5:30 PM, we have the Freer and Sackler edit-a-thon. (Sorry for the short notice!)
 * On Saturday, May 10 we have the Wikipedia APA edit-a-thon, in partnership with the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center, from 10 AM to 5 PM.

We have more stuff coming up in May and June, so make sure to keep a watch on the DC meetup page. As always, if you have any recommendations or requests, please leave a note on the talk page.

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 20:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Meet up with us
<div style="padding:3em; font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif; font-size:110%;">

Happy May!

There are a few meetups in DC this month, including an edit-a-thon later this month. Check it out:
 * On Thursday, May 15 come to our evening WikiSalon at the Cove co-working space in Dupont Circle. If you're available Thursday evening, feel free to join us!
 * Or if you prefer a Saturday night dinner gathering, we also have our May Meetup at Capitol City Brewing Company. (Beer! Non-beer things too!)
 * You are also invited to the Federal Register edit-a-thon at the National Archives later this month.

Come one, come all!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 20:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014
Hi Teammm. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year
You haven't been editing as much, I hope all is well. Bammesk (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I've had a busy year, which is a good thing. You've made a lot of great contributions, creating, etc. I love seeing that! Wish you a Happy New Year! <font style="color:black;font-family:fantasy">Teammm $talk email$ 18:33, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Good to hear from you, and thanks :) Bammesk (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Invitation


Hello, Teammm,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list •  Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter  •   Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride!
<div style="padding:3em; font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif; font-size:110%; line-height:1.75;"> You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!


 * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
 * When? June 2015
 * How can you help?
 * 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
 * 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
 * 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
 * Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
 * Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
 * Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)