User talk:Teancum/Archive3

Demon's Souls' assessment
Hey Teancum. Can you review Demon's Souls? Stabby Joe requested on the Peer Reivew that its status should be higher than C class. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments regarding the article review
Thank you for your helpful comments regarding Orbiter (simulator), as you can see from the talk page I have had some issues narrowing down how to proceed with the article. I will attend to the issues you have raised as best I can, and aim for B class. Metaphorazine (talk) 03:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
I handled 4/7 of the requests, and will get to a couple more when I have time. :) - Taelus  ( Talk ) 07:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hydro Thunder Hurricane re-assessed as B-class per your improvements. Thanks! --- Taelus  ( Talk ) 21:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Haven't reassessed the other one, but I gave the lead a copyedit. Might be worth having a chat with the previous assessor again to clarify about the setting/plot. --- Taelus  ( Talk ) 22:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Updated at my talk page again, assessed another. --- Taelus  ( Talk ) 23:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Fredrik Wester
Hello Teancum, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Fredrik Wester to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 14:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Why?
Why did you undo my edits to the Halo Reach article?CJISBEAST (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Assessment
Thanks for checking and assessing Zack Fair. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Gametoast
I can't get hold of anybody else, and I know that this page isn't really meant for this, but do you have any idea when Gametoast forums will be back online? ggctuk (2005) (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

PROD of Darkest Hour
Hi! Can you please tell me why did you propose the deletion of the page of the upcoming video game Darkest Hour? It has been officially announced by its publisher, Paradox Interactive, and the news has been reported by many websites like Gamasutra, Gamesquad, CombatSim, GamesIndustry, IGN and others. Please let me know what should be added to avoid the deletion, thank you. --AC2010AC2010 (talk) 18:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your answer. However, previews or hands-on demos of video games are usually released around two months before the release of the game, which in this case is set to Q4 2010 / Q1 2011 according to Paradox. Does that mean the article has to be deleted until that time? If there is no other solution, I guess it can't be helped, but are you sure there's nothing else to do? Thanks again for your time. --AC2010AC2010 (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind answer. I understand your reasoning, I guess we can do nothing but wait then. The page will be back once the trailer is out (I hope). Thanks again for your time. --AC2010AC2010 (talk) 06:44, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo reach pic 1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Halo reach pic 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

SWAT 3: Close Quarters Battle assessment
Thanks for reviewing the SWAT3 article. In all honesty, I knew it wasn't exactly TFA material, I was just trying to get a sense of where it was from an independent viewpoint. Cheers, CaptainVindaloo t c e 11:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xmenlegends newxmen.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Xmenlegends newxmen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo reach pic 1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Halo reach pic 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)