User talk:Teb00007

Editing
I noticed your comment to Snowman. Why don't you enable Wiki-Ed in preferences? That highlights text, shows links and formatting. Also has useful tools, eg to convert the ndash hmtl to an actual dash in page ranges  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've just enabled it and it's much the same as the software I was using, only better. :) -- teb 00007  Talk • Contributions 15:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Woodlark
I'm not going to review this because I don't feel I'm impartial enough, but some comments
 * You need to extend the lead to be a fuller summary. There are entire sections, like the subspecies and feeding that aren't mentioned ✅ Done 07:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Taxonomy. You don't say it's the only member of its genus, or say anything about the larks as a family
 * How do the subspecies differ?
 * You may be asked to give imperial conversions of units Not done (see below) 07:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Check grammar, "lark" shouldn't be capitalised, "The Woodlark prefers... They " ✅ Done 07:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Check refs for consistency, eg, some initials have a full stop, some don't ✅ Done 07:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

You could put your nom on the project page, might attract a reviwer. Good luck, let me know if you need help  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your help. I'll go through this later. I'm currently working on the Eurasian Rock Pipit article. The only thing I wouldn't agree with is conversion to imperial measurements, as it's a scientific article. The science community widely uses only the metric system (e.g. in computing, biology and aquaculture at university I'm only allowed to use the metric system in assignments; many of the scientific journals I've read use exclusively metric measurements; the astronomy project on Wikipedia uses only the metric system). As well as that, it's easy to convert to imperial in your head (1 inch ≈ 2.5 centimetres; 1 foot ≈ 30 centimetres; 1 yard ≈ 90 centimetres). And this is a European species. Of course, if it's mandatory I'll update the article but I don't think it should be. Everything else you've pointed out, I'll get onto as soon as possible. -- teb 00007  Talk • Contributions 06:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll come back later to do the taxonomy and subspecies parts. The sources I currently have don't really go into detail on taxonomy so I'll need to do some research. Let me know if you see anything else that could be improved. -- teb 00007  Talk • Contributions 07:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for the GA review at Riverside and Avondale. I really appreciate the hard work you put into those things. Cheers,--Cúchullain t/ c 16:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Woodlark
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Woodlark you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- 12:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, any progress on this? FunkMonk (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Indio Comahue Monument
-- GD uwen  Tell me!  20:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Try #2 - articles edited
Hi teb, I've tweaked the articles for Sturgeon and Regulatory Incubator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kt1502#Feedback_on_New_Articles), following your feedback. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks Kt1502 (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Woodlark
The article Woodlark you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Woodlark for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- 21:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

RfC - scope and title for the American Revolutionary War article
I am forwarding this RfC notice to you, along with the ongoing Discussion Summary Chart because you are listed as a British Empire Project member interested in colonial or military history. The RfC and discussion is found at Talk:American Revolutionary War. Please feel free to delete this notice if it does not fit your current interests. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 11:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

American Revolutionary War, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Milo Moje Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Milo Moje Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)