User talk:TechLoveDrug

Speedy deletion nomination of Serenism
Hello TechLoveDrug,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Serenism for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Benboy00 (talk) 00:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Copy of talk page
I copied this from the talk page because it will be deleted if the article is deleted:

I understand your desire to create a wiki page, and thank you for your support for the wikipedia project. However, wikipedia should not be the first step to creating an organisation. Arguably, it shouldn't be a step at all. First of all, it isnt really good practice for you to write the page about your own organization, as it raises probelms with WP:COI. Perhaps more importantly, it is hugely unlikely that your organization is notable before you create it, or during the creation process. Wikipedia articles must follow WP:NOTABILITY, and articles can only be created after the subject becomes notable, not before. I hope you will continue to contribute to wikipedia, and welcome further discussion (also, please remember to sign your posts with 4 ~'s). Thanks, Benboy00 (talk) 01:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Benboy00 (talk) 01:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello TechLoveDrug. To further explain the above, while the page did not technically qualify under any speedy deletion categories, it's not appropriate for an article here. Wikipedia should never be the first place for information to appear about something&mdash;indeed, it should be one of the last, as it is a tertiary source which requires that information be verifiable through reliable sources. Your movement would have to first be noted extensively by such sources, and then and only then would we write an article about it here. I'm afraid it can't work the other way around. There are other sites which will provide webhosting and a place for you to express what you would like about this philosophy, but this is not one of them.
 * That being said, it's clear from this that you have an interest in political and economic subjects. If you'd like to consider editing in these areas, I can give you some pointers to get started. We do require all content to be strictly neutral, not to promote anyone or anything, and to be verifiable. If you think you're up to that and it would interest you, let me know.
 * I've placed the serenism article for proposed deletion. You can object to such deletion if you like by removing the proposed deletion tag, and that will stop the proposed deletion process, but the article would subsequently be nominated to be discussed at Articles for Deletion. Without substantial source coverage, I'd advise you that the chances of it surviving such a deletion discussion are essentially none. It's nothing against the philosophy you're expressing (and from what's there, I probably would tend largely to agree with it), but rather that if we allowed Wikipedia to be used to promote or "raise awareness" rather than to neutrally cover subjects based upon verifiable sources, we would quickly become a very large digital billboard rather than an encyclopedia.
 * I hope that helps to clarify things. If you have any questions, concerns, etc., feel free to post a reply here. I have the page on watch and will see it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Serenism
Hello, TechLoveDrug,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Serenism should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Serenism.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Benboy00 (talk) 09:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)