User talk:TechMediaEditor

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Textor has been accepted
 John Textor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=John_Textor help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, TechMediaEditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page John Textor, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 19:00, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/TechMediaEditor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * (non-admin comment) You say you don't have a WP:COI then go on to say: I have a prior history with the subject (I was employed by one of the company's he owned from 2014 to 2016, leaving more than 5 years ago''' (emphasis mine) err that is most definitely a WP:COI. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Response to Non-Admin comment above: Please consider reading the definition of a Conflict of Interest. An current employee position would be a conflict of interest, as it would create a conflict of loyalty that is clearly explained in the COI definition. Five years removed from such a position, no such conflict exists. There is no pecuniary relationship and no personal relationship. A conflict of interest needs two conflicting loyalties. That is no longer the case. This is not a COI.
 * (non-admin comment) Please indent your replies to specific posts on talk pages by using colons, so the thread of conversation can flow. Also, you cite the Wikipedia article about the general concept of a "conflict of interest," but it's the Wikipedia policy about editing with regard to a conflict of interest that is being enforced here. An undisclosed past connection to a subject is no different to a present one. I think that everyone can understand why writing about an employer or a former employer is against policy, and why original research is not acceptable. Matuko (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)