User talk:TechNTunes

Speedy deletion nomination of Neurotic Media


A tag has been placed on Neurotic Media, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wgolf (talk) 23:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: download solutions that operates through the support of thousands of code redemption campaign sites... The company’s platform and technology enabled services offer proven ways to drive consumer behavior and increase revenue... The firm takes care of all back-office functions for client brands... to drive consumer behavior with the universal power of artists and songs
 * it's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself. Where are its offices? How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave references, some at least seem to be affiliated to your company, rather than independent sources like newspapers or trade periodicals.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  18:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)